vestreaВестник Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. ПлехановаVestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics2413-28292587-9251Plekhanov Russian University of Economics10.21686/2413-2829-2021-2-124-133vestrea-1054Research ArticleТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА УПРАВЛЕНИЯTHEORY AND PRACTICE OF MANAGEMENTМенеджмент корпоративного обучения и принятие решения об обученииManagement of Corporate Training and Decision-Making about TrainingПавловЯ. Ю.PavlovYa. Yu.

Ярослав Юрьевич Павлов, ректор; генеральный директор

199004, Санкт-Петербург, Васильевский остров, 9-я линия, д. 50, литера А

194017, Санкт-Петербург, проспект Удельный, д. 21, литера А, помещение 4-Н

Yaroslav Yu. Pavlov, Rector; general director

A litera, 50 Line 9, Vasilievsky Island, Saint Petersburg, 199004

4-Н room, A litera, 21 Udelny Avenue, Saint Petersburg, 194017

yaroslav.pavlov@gmail.comЕвсееваИ. К.EvseevaI. K.

Ирина Константиновна Евсеева, аспирантка сектора cоциоурбанистики 

190005, Санкт-Петербург, 7-я Красноармейская ул., д. 25

Irina K. Evseeva, Post-Graduate Student of the Department for Social Urbanistics 

25 7th Krasnoarmeyskaya Str., Saint Petersburg, 190005

rin.evseeva@gmail.comКазаковаИ. Л.KazakovaI. L.

Ирина Леонидовна Казакова, аспирантка кафеды стратегического и международного менеджмента

199004, Санкт-Петербург, Волховский пер., д. 3

Irina L. Kazakova, Post-Graduate Student of the Department for Strategic and International Management

3 Volkhovsky Lane, Saint Petersburg, 199004

levierina@gmail.comСанкт-Петербургский Международный Институт Менеджмента ИМИСП, ООО «АйСи Лаб»РоссияEducational Institution International Management Institute of St. Petersburg IMISP, ICLab LtdRussian FederationСоциологический институт РАН – филиал ФНИСЦ РАНРоссияSociological Institute of the RAS – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of SciencesRussian FederationВысшая школа менеджмента СПбУРоссияGraduate School of Management SPbURussian Federation202109042021182124133Copyright © Павлов Я.Ю., Евсеева И.К., Казакова И.Л., 20212021Павлов Я.Ю., Евсеева И.К., Казакова И.Л.Pavlov Y.Y., Evseeva I.K., Kazakova I.L.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vest.rea.ru/jour/article/view/1054

В статье рассматривается корпоративное обучение в целом как направление исследований и степень изученности вопроса принятия решения в данной сфере деятельности в частности. Принятие решения является основополагающим моментом в менеджменте корпоративного обучения, так как от его механизма зависит модель образования. В предшествующих исследованиях этот вопрос затрагивался косвенно. Для дальнейшего углубленного его изучения необходимо понимание актуального уровня исследования вышеуказанного направления. Цель статьи – изучение методов, применяемых в данном направлении, и современного состояния данного поля научных исследований. Для достижения целей исследования был произведен дескриптивный литературный обзор источников из международной базы данных Web of Science с фокусом на изучении методологии и уровня теоретической проработки вопроса. Результатами исследования стало выявление нескольких ключевых трендов при изучении корпоративного обучения и обнаруженное преобладание количественных исследований в условиях недостаточной их теоретической проработки. При этом в изученных работах как базовый концепт чаще всего использовались концепция обучающейся организации К. Уоткинса и В. Марсика и модель цифровой зрелости А. Бэка и С. Бергауз.

The article studies corporate training in general as a line in research and a concrete issue about the degree of investigation of the issue of decision-making in this sphere of activity. The issue of decision-making is fundamental for management of corporate training, as training model depends on this mechanism. In previous studies this issue was touched upon only indirectly. To study this problem deeply it is necessary to understand the topical level of research on mentioned-above direction. The goal of the article is to study methods used in this sphere and current condition of this field of academic research. In order to attain the goals of the research descriptive literature review of sources from the international database Web of Science was carried out focusing on studying methodology and level of theoretical investigation. As a result the article identified several key trends in studying corporate training and revealed predominance of quantitative works even in conditions of insufficient theoretical investigation. Works being analyzed more often used concepts of training organization by K. Watkins and V. Marsic and the model of digital maturity by A. Back and S. Berhause.

управление персоналомэлектронное обучениецифровая трансформацияHR managementdecision-makinge-trainingdigital transformationReferencesДежина И. Г., Ключарев И. А. Российское образование для инновационной экономики: «болевые точки» // Социологические исследования. – 2018. – № 9. – С. 40–48.Dezhina I. G., Klyucharev I. A. Rossiyskoe obrazovanie dlya innovatsionnoy ekonomiki: «bolevye tochki» [Russian Education for Innovation Economy: ‘Pain Points’]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Surveys], 2018, No. 9, pp. 40–48. (In Russ.).Akgün A. E., Lynn G. S., Byrne J. C. Organizational Learning: A Socio-Cognitive Framework // Human Relations. – 2003. – N 56. – P. 839–868. – DOI: 10.1177/00187267030567004Akgün A. E., Lynn G. S., Byrne J. C. Organizational Learning: A Socio-Cognitive Framework. Human Relations, 2003, No. 56, pp. 839–868. DOI: 10.1177/00187267030567004Berghaus S., Back A., Kaltenrieder B. Digital Transformation Report 2015. – URL: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiFku3fy7DuAhXJxIsKHfq9DoQQFjAAegQIARAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.post.ch%2Fbosw%2F-%2Fmedia%2Fpost%2Fbosw%2Fdokumente%2F20150430_dtreport2015.pdf%3Fla%3Dde&usg=AOvVaw2KFYTqlsXt16X26z_XLXlgBerghaus S., Back A., Kaltenrieder B. Digital Transformation Report 2015. Available at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiFku3fy7DuAhXJxIsKHfq9DoQQFjAAegQIARAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.post.ch%2Fbosw%2F-%2Fmedia%2Fpost%2Fbosw%2Fdokumente%2F20150430_dtreport2015.pdf%3Fla%3Dde&usg=AOvVaw2KFYTqlsXt16X26z_XLXlgDevarakonda S. Calculating the Economic Viability of Corporate Trainings (Traditional & eLearning) using Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) and Return On Investment (ROI) // International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning. – 2019. – N 12 (1). – P. 41–57.Devarakonda S. Calculating the Economic Viability of Corporate Trainings (Traditional & eLearning) using Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) and Return On Investment (ROI). International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 2019, No. 12 (1), pp. 41–57.Garavan T., McCarthy A., Sheehan M., Lai Y., Saunders M. N. K., Clarke N., Carbery R., Shanahan V. Measuring the Organizational Impact of Training: The Need for Greater Methodological Rigor // Human Resource Development Quarterly. – 2019. – N 30. – P. 291–309.Garavan T., McCarthy A., Sheehan M., Lai Y., Saunders M. N. K., Clarke N., Carbery R., Shanahan V. Measuring the Organizational Impact of Training: The Need for Greater Methodological Rigor. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2019, No. 30, pp. 291–309.Kok A. How to Manage the Inclusion of E-Learning in Learning Strategy Insights From a Turkish Banking Institution // International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning. – 2013. – N 6 (1). – P. 20–27.Kok A. How to Manage the Inclusion of E-Learning in Learning Strategy Insights From a Turkish Banking Institution. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 2013, No. 6 (1), pp. 20–27.Leufvén M., Vitrakoti R., Bergström A., Kc A., Målqvist M. Dimensions of Learning Organizations Questionnaire (DLOQ) in a Low-Resource Health Care Setting in Nepal // Health Research Policy and Systems. – 2015. – N 13 (1). – DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-13-6.Leufvén M., Vitrakoti R., Bergström A., Kc A., Målqvist M. Dimensions of Learning Organizations Questionnaire (DLOQ) in a Low-Resource Health Care Setting in Nepal. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2015, No. 13 (1). DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-13-6.Seufert S., Meier C. From eLearning to Digital Transformation: A Framework and Implications for L&D // International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning. – 2016. – N 9 (2). – P. 27–33.Seufert S., Meier C. From eLearning to Digital Transformation: A Framework and Implications for L&D. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 2016, No. 9 (2), pp. 27–33.Stanton W. W., Stanton A. Traditional and Online Learning in Executive Education: How Both Will Survive and Thrive // Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education. – 2017. – N 15 (1). – P. 8–24.Stanton W. W., Stanton A. Traditional and Online Learning in Executive Education: How Both Will Survive and Thrive. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2017, No. 15 (1), pp. 8–24.Sung S. Y., Choi J. N. To Invest or not to Invest: Strategic Decision–Making Toward Investing in Training and Development in Korean Manufacturing Firms // Human Resource Development Quarterly. – 2018. – N 29 (13). – P. 2080–2105.Sung S. Y., Choi J. N. To Invest or not to Invest: Strategic Decision–Making Toward Investing in Training and Development in Korean Manufacturing Firms. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2018, No. 29 (13), pp. 2080–2105.Thomasma T. Customized E-Learning for B2B Companies // International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning. – 2014. – N 7 (2). – P. 30–31.Thomasma T. Customized E-Learning for B2B Companies. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 2014, No. 7 (2), pp. 30–31.Van Roij S. W., Merkebu J. Measuring the Business Impact of Employee Learning: A View from the Professional Services Sector // Human Resource Development Quarterly. – 2015. – N 26 (3). – P. 275–297.Van Roij S. W., Merkebu J. Measuring the Business Impact of Employee Learning: A View from the Professional Services Sector. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2015, No. 26 (3), pp. 275–297.Watkins K. E., Kim K. Current Status and Promising Directions for Research on the Learning Organization // Human Resource Development Quarterly. – 2018. – N 29. – P. 15–29.Watkins K. E., Kim K. Current Status and Promising Directions for Research on the Learning Organization. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2018, No. 29, pp. 15–29.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.