vestreaВестник Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. ПлехановаVestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics2413-28292587-9251Plekhanov Russian University of Economics10.21686/2413-2829-2022-4-56-65vestrea-1382Research ArticleРЕГИОНАЛЬНАЯ ЭКОНОМИКАREGIONAL ECONOMYВлияние корпоративной социальной ответственности на экономический рост регионаThe Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Economic Growth in the RegionБезуглаяН. С.BezuglayaN. S.

Наталия Сергеевна Безуглая - кандидат экономических наук, доцент кафедры экономики и управления

350002, Краснодар, ул. Садовая, д. 23

Nataliya S. Bezuglaya - PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department for Economics and Management

23 Sadovaya Str., Krasnodar, 350002

olimpia_n@mail.ruКраснодарский филиал Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. ПлехановаРоссияKrasnodar branch of the Plekhanov Russian University of EconomicsRussian Federation202222072022045665Copyright © Безуглая Н.С., 20222022Безуглая Н.С.Bezuglaya N.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vest.rea.ru/jour/article/view/1382

Статья посвящена исследованию проблем цивилизационного развития, которыми являются конфликт интересов владельцев бизнеса, крупных транснациональных корпораций, стремление общества двигаться по пути устойчивого развития. Цели устойчивого развития ООН включают сохранение окружающей среды, повышение благосостояния стран и преодоление бедности. Транснациональные корпорации и предприятия в регионах находятся на пути приверженности принципам корпоративной социальной ответственности, которые отчасти согласуются с целями устойчивого развития, но направлены на поддержание благосостояния владельцев бизнеса. Тенденции в мировой экономике показывают, что несколько транснациональных корпораций по уровню доходов превосходят подавляющее большинство государств. Таким образом, экономические гиганты способны оказывать существенное влияние на государственную политику региона, на состояние окружающей среды и благосостояние населения. Но компании и собственники заинтересованы только в выделении ресурсов развивающимся странам, что мешает им априори действовать в рамках целей устойчивого развития. Как показывают доклады ООН, противостояние и конфликт между капиталом и обществом привели к медленной и сложной реализации целей устойчивого развития. Автор предлагает несколько мер по устранению этого дисбаланса в направлении преобладания целей устойчивого развития.

The article studies problems of civilization development, which implies the conflict of interests of business proprietors, big multinational corporations and society urge towards sustainable development. The UN goals of sustainable development include environment protection, improving wellbeing of countries and overcoming poverty. Multinational corporations and regional enterprises stick to principles of corporate social responsibility, which partially comply with goals of sustainable development, but orient towards support of business proprietors’ wellbeing. Trends in global economy show that some multinationals by the level of their profits surpass the majority of countries. Thus, economic giants can render serious impact on state policy of the region, environmental situation and population prosperity. But companies and proprietors are interested only in allocating resources to developing countries, which prevents them from working for the goals of sustainable development. According to UN reports, confrontation and conflict between capital and society resulted in slow and complicated realization of goals of sustainable development. The author put forward a number of steps aimed at elimination of misbalance towards predominance of goals of sustainable development.

устойчивое развитиеорганизационная эффективностьризоматический подходкорпоративный доходтранснациональные корпорацииsustainable developmentorganizational efficiencyrizomatic approachcorporate profitmultinational corporationsReferencesЩедровицкий Г. П. Оргудикальное мышление: идеология, методология, технология : курс лекций. – 2-е изд. – М., 2003. – (Из архива Г. П. Щедровицкого).Shchedrovitskiy G. P. Orgudikalnoe myshlenie: ideologiya, metodologiya, tekhnologiya, kurs lektsiy [Orgudical Thinking: Ideology, Methodology, Tehnology, lecture course]. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2003. (From the archives of G. P. Shchedrovitsky). (In Russ.).Agasisti T., Bertoletti A. Higher Education and Economic Growth: A Longitudinal Study of European Regions 2000–2017 // Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. – 2020. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100940Agasisti T., Bertoletti A. Higher Education and Economic Growth: A Longitudinal Study of European Regions 2000–2017. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100940Aghion P., Durlauf S. Handbook of Economic Growth. – Vol. 2. – North Holland, 2013. – P. 1176.Aghion P., Durlauf S. Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 2. North Holland, 2013, p. 1176.Aupperle K. E., Carroll A. B., Hatfield J. D. An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability // Academy of Management Journal. – 1985. – N 28 (2). – P. 446–463.Aupperle K. E., Carroll A. B., Hatfield J. D. An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, No. 28 (2), pp. 446–463.Berman S. L., Wicks A. C., Kotha S., Jones T. M. Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance // Academy of Management Journal. – 1999. – Vol. 42. – Issue 5. – P. 488–506.Berman S. L., Wicks A. C., Kotha S., Jones T. M. Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, Vol. 42, Issue 5, pp. 488–506.David P. A., Reder M. W. Nations and Households in Economic Growth. Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz. – New York : Academic Press, 1974. – P. 428.David P. A., Reder M. W. Nations and Households in Economic Growth. Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York, Academic Press, 1974, p. 428.Fraumeni B. Measuring Economic Growth and Productivity. Foundations, KLEMS Production Models, and Extensions. – New York : Academic Press, 2019. – P. 554.Fraumeni B. Measuring Economic Growth and Productivity. Foundations, KLEMS Production Models, and Extensions. New York, Academic Press, 2019, p. 554.Higgins K. Economic Growth and Sustainability. Systems Thinking for a Complex World. – New York : Academic Press, 2015. – P. 228.Higgins K. Economic Growth and Sustainability. Systems Thinking for a Complex World. New York, Academic Press, 2015, p. 228.Jin K. G., Drozdenko R. G. Relationships Among Perceived Organizational Core Values, Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Organizational Performance Outcomes: An Empirical Study of Information Technology Professionals // Journal of Business Ethics. – 2010. – Vol. 92. – Issue 3. – P. 341–359.Jin K. G., Drozdenko R. G. Relationships Among Perceived Organizational Core Values, Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Organizational Performance Outcomes: An Empirical Study of Information Technology Professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 92, Issue 3, 2010, pp. 341–359.Lamberton G. Sustainability Accounting – A Brief History and Conceptual Framework // Accounting Forum. – 2005. – Vol. 29 (1). – P. 7–26.Lamberton G. Sustainability Accounting – A Brief History and Conceptual Framework. Accounting Forum, 2005, Vol. 29 (1), pp. 7–26.López-Arceiz F. J., Bellostas-Pérezgrueso A. J., Moneva-Abadía J. M., Rivera-Torres M. P. The Role of Corporate Governance and Transparency in the Generation of Financial Performance in Socially Responsible Companies // Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting = Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad. – 2018. – Vol. 47 (1). – P. 44–80.López-Arceiz F. J., Bellostas-Pérezgrueso A. J., Moneva-Abadía J. M., Rivera-Torres M. P. The Role of Corporate Governance and Transparency in the Generation of Financial Performance in Socially Responsible Companies. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting = Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 2018, Vol. 47 (1), pp. 44–80.Margolis J. D., Walsh J. P. Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business // Administrative Science Quarterly. – 2003. – Vol. 48 (2). – P. 268–305.Margolis J. D., Walsh J. P. Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, Vol. 48 (2), pp. 268–305.Michetti M., Marchello M. P., Lupo P. Climate Change, Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Role of Financial Institutions // Sixth International Conference on Ethics and Environmental Policies Ethics and Climate Change. Scenarios for Justice and Sustainability. – Padova, 2008.Michetti M., Marchello M. P., Lupo P. Climate Change, Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Role of Financial Institutions. Sixth International Conference on Ethics and Environmental Policies Ethics and Climate Change. Scenarios for Justice and Sustainability. Padova, 2008.Mishra S., Suar D. Does Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Firm Performance of Indian companies? // Journal of Business Ethics. – 2010. – Vol. 95. – Issue 4. – P. 571–601.Mishra S., Suar D. Does Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Firm Performance of Indian companies? Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, Vol. 95, Issue 4, pp. 571–601.Orlitzky M., Schmidt F. L., Rynes S. L. Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis // Organization studies. – 2003. – Vol. 24 (3). – P. 403–441.Orlitzky M., Schmidt F. L., Rynes S. L. Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Organization studies, 2003, Vol. 24 (3), pp. 403–441.Perrini F., Tencati A. Sustainability and Stakeholder Management: the Need for New Corporate Performance Evaluation and Reporting Systems // Business Strategy and the Environment. – 2006. – Vol. 15 (5). – P. 296–308.Perrini F., Tencati A. Sustainability and Stakeholder Management: the Need for New Corporate Performance Evaluation and Reporting Systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2006, Vol. 15 (5), pp. 296–308.Rodriguez M., Carrasco Gallego A., Perez E. B. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: a Meta-Analysis // Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting-Revista Espanola De Financiacion y Contabilida. – 2014. – Vol. 43 (2). – P. 193–215.Rodriguez M., Carrasco Gallego A., Perez E. B. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: a Meta-Analysis. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting-Revista Espanola De Financiacion y Contabilida, 2014, Vol. 43 (2), pp. 193–215.Schaltegger S., Burritt R. L. Sustainability Accounting for Companies: Catchphrase or Decision Support for Business Leaders? // Journal of World Business. – 2010. – Vol. 45 (4). – P. 375–384.Schaltegger S., Burritt R. L. Sustainability Accounting for Companies: Catchphrase or Decision Support for Business Leaders? Journal of World Business, 2010, Vol. 45 (4), pp. 375–384.Schwartz B., Tilling K. ISO‐lating’ Corporate Social Responsibility in the Organizational Context: a Dissenting Interpretation of ISO 26000 // Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. – 2009. – July 27.Schwartz B., Tilling K. ISO‐lating’ Corporate Social Responsibility in the Organizational Context: a Dissenting Interpretation of ISO 26000. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2009, July 27.Singh K., Misra M. Linking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Organizational Performance: the Moderating Effect of Corporate Reputation // European Research on Management and Business Economics. – 2021. – Vol. 27. – Issue 1. – January – April. – P. 100139.Singh K., Misra M. Linking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Organizational Performance: the Moderating Effect of Corporate Reputation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 2021, Vol. 27, Issue 1, January – April, p. 100139.Stanwick P. A., Stanwick S. D. The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination // Journal of Business Ethics. – 1998. – Vol. 17 (2). – P. 195–204.Stanwick P. A., Stanwick S. D. The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 1998, Vol. 17 (2), pp. 195–204.Take Action for the Sustainable Development Goals. – URL: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/Take Action for the Sustainable Development Goals. Available at: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.