vestreaВестник Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. ПлехановаVestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics2413-28292587-9251Plekhanov Russian University of Economics10.21686/2413-2829-2025-5-97-110vestrea-2462Research ArticleУПРАВЛЕНИЕ ИННОВАЦИЯМИINNOVATION MANAGEMENTИнституциональная трансформация управления бизнес-экосистемамиInstitutional Transformation of Business-Ecosystem ManagementВорожихинВ. В.VorozhikhinV. V.

Владимир Вальтерович Ворожихин, кандидат экономических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник

научно-исследовательский институт развития образования

109992; Стремянный пер., д. 36; 117218; Нахимовский проспект, д. 32; Москва

Vladimir V. Vorozhikhin, PhD, Leading Researcher

Research Institute for Educational

109992; 36 Stremyanny Lane; 117218; 32 Nakhimovsky Avenue; Moscow

vorozhikhin@mail.ruРоссийский экономический университет имени Г. В. Плеханова; Институт проблем развития науки Российской академии наукРоссияPlekhanov Russian University of Economics; Institute for Problems of Science Development of the Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Federation2025300920250597110Copyright © Ворожихин В.В., 20252025Ворожихин В.В.Vorozhikhin V.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vest.rea.ru/jour/article/view/2462

   Трансформация управления бизнес-экосистемой связана с оптимизацией системы управления, повышением качества и эффективностью принятия научно обоснованных решений. При этом на определенных этапах развития целесообразно использование различных способов построения систем управления экосистемой. Совершенствование экосистем выводит их на новый этап развития в форме человеческой экосистемы. Это позволяет использовать новые подходы для совершенствования управления на всех уровнях – от глобального и странового до регионального, городского и корпоративного. В статье показано развитие экосистем как способа описания сложных организаций и приведена классификация их основных форм. Автором дано определение экосистем, сформированное на основе представления об экосистемной услуге и отражающее суть процессов их координации и динамики, которое позволяет классифицировать бизнес-экосистемы с учетом разнообразия их применения. Отмечены основания формирования дискуссии о самоорганизации в экосистемах с позиций процессов координации и управления экосистемами в рамках подходов фокусной фирмы, лидерства и брокера экосистемы.

   Transformation of business-ecosystem management is connected with optimization of the management system, rise in quality and efficiency of making scientifically justified decisions. At the same time it is reasonable at certain stages of development to use different ways of building a system of ecosystem management. Upgrading ecosystems lead them to a new stage of development in the form of a human ecosystem. It provides an opportunity to use new approaches to improve management at all levels, from global and country to regional, city and corporate. The article shows the development of ecosystems as a way to describe complicated organizations and provides classification of their principle forms. The author gives a definition of ecosystems worked-out on the basis of the idea of ecosystem service, which demonstrates the essence of processes of their coordination and dynamics, as it allows us to classify business-ecosystems taking into account variety of their use. The article puts forward the grounds for further discussion about self-organization in ecosystems in view of processes of ecosystem coordination and management within the frames of approaches of ecosystem focus-corporation, leadership and broker.

экосистемафокусная фирмалидерствоброкерсамоорганизациячеловеческая экосистемаecosystemfocus-corporationleadershipbrokerself-organizationhuman ecosystemReferencesCohen B. Sustainable Valley Entrepreneurial Ecosystems // Business Strategy and the Environment. – 2006. – Vol. 15 (1). – P. 1–14.Cohen B. Sustainable Valley Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2006, Vol. 15 (1), pp. 1–14.Digital Ecosystem. – URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/digital-ecosystem (дата обращения: 05. 06. 2024).Digital Ecosystem. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/digital-ecosystem (accessed 05. 06. 2024).Estrada-Jimenez L. A., Pulikottil T., Nikghadam-Hojjati S., Barata J. Self-Organization in Smart Manufacturing – Background, Systematic Review, Challenges and Outlook // IEEE Access. – 2023. – Vol. 11. – P. 10107–10136.Estrada-Jimenez L. A., Pulikottil T., Nikghadam-Hojjati S., Barata J. Self-Organization in Smart Manufacturing – Background, Systematic Review, Challenges and Outlook. IEEE Access, 2023, Vol. 11, pp. 10107–10136.Estrada-Jimenez L. A., Pulikottil T., Peres R. S., Nikghadam-Hojjati S., Barata J. Complexity Theory and Self-Organization in Cyber-Physical Production Systems // Procedia CIRP. – 2021. – Vol. 104. – P. 1831–1836.Estrada-Jimenez L. A., Pulikottil T., Peres R. S., Nikghadam-Hojjati S., Barata J. Complexity Theory and Self-Organization in Cyber-Physical Production Systems. Procedia CIRP, 2021, Vol. 104, pp. 1831–1836.Foss N. J., Schmidt J., Teece D. J. Ecosystem Leadership as a Dynamic Capability // Long Range Planning. – 2023. – Vol. 56. – Issue 1. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102270Foss N. J., Schmidt J., Teece D. J. Ecosystem Leadership as a Dynamic Capability. Long Range Planning, 2023, Vol. 56, Issue 1. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102270Industrial Data Space. Digital Souvereignity Over Data. – URL: https://publica.fraunhofer.de/entities/publication/e63938c4-bcc6-4b93-95ef-e071649697bd/detailsIndustrial Data Space. Digital Souvereignity Over Data. Available at: https://publica.fraunhofer.de/entities/publication/e63938c4-bcc6-4b93-95ef-e071649697bd/detailsKoch M., Krohmer D., Naab M., Rost D., Trapp M. A Matter of Definition: Criteria for Digital Ecosystems // Digital Business. – 2022. – Vol. 2. – Issue 2. – doi: 10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100027Koch M., Krohmer D., Naab M., Rost D., Trapp M. A Matter of Definition: Criteria for Digital Ecosystems. Digital Business, 2022, Vol. 2, Issue 2. doi: 10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100027Mann G., Karanasios S., Breidbach Ch. Orchestrating the Digital Transformation of a Business Ecosystem // The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. – 2022. – Vol. 31. – Issue 3. – URL: doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101733Mann G., Karanasios S., Breidbach Ch. Orchestrating the Digital Transformation of a Business Ecosystem. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2022, Vol. 31, Issue 3. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101733Moore J. F. The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. – 1<sup>st</sup> edition. – New York: HarperBusiness, 1996.Moore J. F. The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. 1<sup>st</sup> edition. New York, HarperBusiness, 1996.Moore J. F., Rong K., Zhang R. The Human Ecosystem // Journal of Digital Economy. – 2022. – Vol. 1. – Issue 1. – P. 53–72.Moore J. F., Rong K., Zhang R. The Human Ecosystem. Journal of Digital Economy, 2022, Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 53–72.Serugendo G. D. M., Gleizes M.-P., Karageorgos A. Selforganization in Multi-Agent Systems // The Knowledge Engineering Review. – 2005. – Vol. 20 (02). – P. 165–189.Serugendo G. D. M., Gleizes M.-P., Karageorgos A. Selforganization in Multi-Agent Systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 2005, Vol. 20 (02), pp. 165–189.Sheninger E. C. Digital Leadership: Changing Paradigms for Changing Times. – 2<sup>nd</sup> edition. – New York, 2019.Sheninger E. C. Digital Leadership: Changing Paradigms for Changing Times. 2<sup>nd</sup> edition. New York, 2019.Suuronen S., Ukko J., Saunila M., Rantala T., Rantanen H. The Implications of Multi-Sided Platforms in Managing Digital Business Ecosystems // Journal of Business Research. – 2024. – Vol. 175. – doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114544Suuronen S., Ukko J., Saunila M., Rantala T., Rantanen H. The Implications of Multi-Sided Platforms in Managing Digital Business Ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 2024, Vol. 175. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114544Theodoraki Ch., Dana L.-P., Caputo A. Building Sustainable Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A Holistic Approach // Journal of Business Research. – 2022. – Vol. 140. – P. 346–360.Theodoraki Ch., Dana L.-P., Caputo A. Building Sustainable Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A Holistic Approach. Journal of Business Research, 2022, Vol. 140, pp. 346–360.Tsujimoto M., Kajikawa Y., Tomita J., Matsumoto Y. A Review of the Ecosystem Concept – Towards Coherent Ecosystem Design // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. – 2018. – Vol. 136. – P. 49–58.Tsujimoto M., Kajikawa Y., Tomita J., Matsumoto Y. A Review of the Ecosystem Concept – Towards Coherent Ecosystem Design. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, Vol. 136, pp. 49–58.Van Der Leeuw S. Social Sustainability, Past and Future: Undoing Unintended Consequences for the Earth’s Survival. – Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Van Der Leeuw S. Social Sustainability, Past and Future: Undoing Unintended Consequences for the Earth’s Survival. Cambridge, U. K., Cambridge University Press, 2020.Vial G. Understanding Digital Transformation: A Review and a Research Agenda // The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. – 2019. – Vol. 28. – Issue 2. – P. 118–144.Vial G. Understanding Digital Transformation: A Review and a Research Agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019, Vol. 28, Issue 2, pp. 118–144.Wang H., Zheng L. J., Zhang J. Z., Kumar A., Srivastava P. R. Unpacking Complementarity in Innovation Ecosystems: A Configurational Analysis of Knowledge Transfer for Achieving Breakthrough Innovation // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. – 2024. – Vol. 198. – doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122974Wang H., Zheng L. J., Zhang J. Z., Kumar A., Srivastava P. R. Unpacking Complementarity in Innovation Ecosystems: A Configurational Analysis of Knowledge Transfer for Achieving Breakthrough Innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, Vol. 198. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122974

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.