Management of Corporate Training and Decision-Making about Training
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2021-2-124-133
Abstract
The article studies corporate training in general as a line in research and a concrete issue about the degree of investigation of the issue of decision-making in this sphere of activity. The issue of decision-making is fundamental for management of corporate training, as training model depends on this mechanism. In previous studies this issue was touched upon only indirectly. To study this problem deeply it is necessary to understand the topical level of research on mentioned-above direction. The goal of the article is to study methods used in this sphere and current condition of this field of academic research. In order to attain the goals of the research descriptive literature review of sources from the international database Web of Science was carried out focusing on studying methodology and level of theoretical investigation. As a result the article identified several key trends in studying corporate training and revealed predominance of quantitative works even in conditions of insufficient theoretical investigation. Works being analyzed more often used concepts of training organization by K. Watkins and V. Marsic and the model of digital maturity by A. Back and S. Berhause.
About the Authors
Ya. Yu. Pavlov
Educational Institution International Management Institute of St. Petersburg IMISP, ICLab Ltd
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yaroslav Yu. Pavlov, Rector; general director
A litera, 50 Line 9, Vasilievsky Island, Saint Petersburg, 199004
4-Н room, A litera, 21 Udelny Avenue, Saint Petersburg, 194017
I. K. Evseeva
Sociological Institute of the RAS – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina K. Evseeva, Post-Graduate Student of the Department for Social Urbanistics
25 7th Krasnoarmeyskaya Str., Saint Petersburg, 190005
I. L. Kazakova
Graduate School of Management SPbU
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina L. Kazakova, Post-Graduate Student of the Department for Strategic and International Management
3 Volkhovsky Lane, Saint Petersburg, 199004
References
1. Dezhina I. G., Klyucharev I. A. Rossiyskoe obrazovanie dlya innovatsionnoy ekonomiki: «bolevye tochki» [Russian Education for Innovation Economy: ‘Pain Points’]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Surveys], 2018, No. 9, pp. 40–48. (In Russ.).
2. Akgün A. E., Lynn G. S., Byrne J. C. Organizational Learning: A Socio-Cognitive Framework. Human Relations, 2003, No. 56, pp. 839–868. DOI: 10.1177/00187267030567004
3. Berghaus S., Back A., Kaltenrieder B. Digital Transformation Report 2015. Available at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiFku3fy7DuAhXJxIsKHfq9DoQQFjAAegQIARAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.post.ch%2Fbosw%2F-%2Fmedia%2Fpost%2Fbosw%2Fdokumente%2F20150430_dtreport2015.pdf%3Fla%3Dde&usg=AOvVaw2KFYTqlsXt16X26z_XLXlg
4. Devarakonda S. Calculating the Economic Viability of Corporate Trainings (Traditional & eLearning) using Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) and Return On Investment (ROI). International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 2019, No. 12 (1), pp. 41–57.
5. Garavan T., McCarthy A., Sheehan M., Lai Y., Saunders M. N. K., Clarke N., Carbery R., Shanahan V. Measuring the Organizational Impact of Training: The Need for Greater Methodological Rigor. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2019, No. 30, pp. 291–309.
6. Kok A. How to Manage the Inclusion of E-Learning in Learning Strategy Insights From a Turkish Banking Institution. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 2013, No. 6 (1), pp. 20–27.
7. Leufvén M., Vitrakoti R., Bergström A., Kc A., Målqvist M. Dimensions of Learning Organizations Questionnaire (DLOQ) in a Low-Resource Health Care Setting in Nepal. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2015, No. 13 (1). DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-13-6.
8. Seufert S., Meier C. From eLearning to Digital Transformation: A Framework and Implications for L&D. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 2016, No. 9 (2), pp. 27–33.
9. Stanton W. W., Stanton A. Traditional and Online Learning in Executive Education: How Both Will Survive and Thrive. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2017, No. 15 (1), pp. 8–24.
10. Sung S. Y., Choi J. N. To Invest or not to Invest: Strategic Decision–Making Toward Investing in Training and Development in Korean Manufacturing Firms. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2018, No. 29 (13), pp. 2080–2105.
11. Thomasma T. Customized E-Learning for B2B Companies. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 2014, No. 7 (2), pp. 30–31.
12. Van Roij S. W., Merkebu J. Measuring the Business Impact of Employee Learning: A View from the Professional Services Sector. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2015, No. 26 (3), pp. 275–297.
13. Watkins K. E., Kim K. Current Status and Promising Directions for Research on the Learning Organization. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2018, No. 29, pp. 15–29.
Review
For citations:
Pavlov Ya.Yu., Evseeva I.K., Kazakova I.L. Management of Corporate Training and Decision-Making about Training. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2021;18(2):124-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2021-2-124-133
Views:
554
Email this article 