Preview

Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Advanced search

Land Tenure Planning in Order to Develop Territories of Traditional Natural Resource Use: Experience of Canada

https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2021-4-169-179

Abstract

The article studies issues of land tenure planning for implementation of projects aimed at industrial development of the Arctic. Using the example of Northern provinces of Canada it shows evolution of land tenure strategic planning, analyzes its role in social and economic development of the territory. It is shown that involvement of aboriginal people of the North in the process of planning the use of land, forest and other natural resources can lower conflicts among land users, mining companies and the local population, protect territories of traditional land tenure in places of residence and traditional natural resource use of aborigine people and create necessary conditions for the development of traditional types of activity and sustainable space development of the Arctic. Canadian experience of land tenure planning in development of Arctic territories in the area of aboriginal people residence can be used in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation to balance interests of concerned parties, i.e. local bodies of power, business and aboriginal people of the North.

About the Author

A. V. Novikov
State University of Land Use Planning
Russian Federation

Alexey V. Novikov - PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department for Urban Cadastre of the SULUP.

15 Kazakova Str., Moscow, 105064.



References

1. Burtseva E. I., Potravnyy I. M., Gassiy V. V., Sleptsov A. N., Velichenko V. V. Voprosy otsenki i kompensatsii ubytkov korennym malochislennym narodam v usloviyakh promyshlennogo osvoeniya Arktiki [Estimation and Compensation for Losses for Aboriginal Scanty Peoples in Conditions of Industrial Development of the Arctic]. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika [Arctic: Ecology and Economics], 2019, No. 1 (33), pp. 27-42. (In Russ.).

2. Novikov A. V. Analiz zemelnykh resursov pribrezhnykh arkticheskikh zon Respubliki Sakha (Yakutiya) [Analyzing Land Resources of Coastal Arctic Zones in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutiya)]. Gorizonty ekonomiki [Horizons of Economics], 2021, No. 2 (61), pp. 98-103. (In Russ.).

3. Novoselova I. Yu., Novoselov A. L., Potravnyy I. M., Avramenko A. A. Upravlenie konfliktami v sfere prirodopolzovaniya: analiz i poisk kompromissov, monografiya [Conflict Management in the Field of Natural Resource Use: Analysis, and Search for Compromises, monograph]. Moscow, KnoRus, 2020. (In Russ.).

4. Potravnyy I. M., Gassiy V. V. Razvitie osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territoriy kak zadacha ekologicheskoy ekonomiki [The Development of Protected Natural Territories as an Objective of Ecological Economics]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo Tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Izvestiya of the Samara Academic Center of the Russian Academy of Science], 2016, Vol. 18, No. 2 (2), pp. 609-612. (In Russ.).

5. Potravnyy I. M., Gassiy V. V., Afanasev S. M. Territorii traditsionnogo prirodopolzovaniya: ogranicheniya razvitiya ili potentsial ekonomicheskogo rosta? [Territories of Traditional Natural Resource Use: Restrictions or Potential of Economic Growth?]. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2017, No. 2 (26), pp. 4-16. (In Russ.).

6. Potravnyy I. M., Motorina M. A. Razvitie opornykh zon v rossiyskoy Arktike na osnove proektnogo podkhoda [The Development of Strong Zones in the Russian Arctic on the Basis of Project Approach]. Gorizonty ekonomiki [Horizons of Economics], 2017, No. 6 (390), pp. 31-37. (In Russ.).

7. Ustoychivoe prostranstvennoe razvitie. Proektirovanie i upravlenie, monografiya [Sustainable Space Development. Projection and Management, monograph], edited by N. V. Komov, S. A. Sharipov, S. I. Nosov, Yu. A. Tsypkin. Moscow, 2021. (In Russ.).

8. Ekonomika traditsionnogo prirodopolzovaniya: vzaimodeystvie korennykh narodov Severa i biznesa v rossiyskoy Arktike [Economics of Traditional Natural Resources Use: Interaction of Aboriginal People of the North and Business in the Russian Arctic], edited by E. I. Burtseva, I. M. Potravnyy. Moscow, Ekonomika, 2019. (In Russ.).

9. Anderson R. B., Dana L. P., Dana T. E. Indigenous Land Right, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Development in Canada: Opting-in to the Global Economy. Journal of World Business, 2006, No. 41 (1), pp. 45-55.

10. Baldwin A. Carbon Nullius and Racial Rule: Race, Nature and the Cultural Politics of Forest Carbon in Canada. Antipode, 2009, No. 41 (2), pp. 231-255.

11. Berkes F. Evolution of Co-Management: Role of Knowledge Generation, Bridging Organizations and Social Learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, No. 90 (5), pp. 1692-1702.

12. Berman M., Schmidt J. I. Economic Effects of Climate Change in Alaska. Weather, Climate, and Society, 2019, Vol. 11, pp. 245-258.

13. Booth A. L., Muir B. R. Environmental and Land-Use Planning Approaches of Indigenous Groups in Canada: An Overview. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2011, No. 13 (4), pp. 421-442.

14. Novoselov N., Potravny I., Novoselova I., Gassiy V. Sustainable Development of the Arctic Indigenous Communities: The Approach to Projects Optimization of Mining Company. Sustainability, 2020, No. 12 (19), p. 7963.

15. Racey G. D. Climate Change and Woodland Caribou in Northwestern Ontario: A Risk Analysis. Rangifer, 2011, No. 25 (4), pp. 123-136.

16. Stand A. L., Muir B. R. Environmental and Local Group Land-Use Planning Approaches in Canada: an Overview. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2011, No. 13 (4), pp. 421-442.

17. Zurba M., Stucker D., Mwaura G., Burlando C., Rastogi A., Dhyani S., Koss R. Intergenerational Dialogue, Collaboration, Learning, and Decision-Making in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the IUCN Intergenerational Partnership for Sustainability. Sustainability, 2020, No. 12, p. 498.


Review

For citations:


Novikov A.V. Land Tenure Planning in Order to Develop Territories of Traditional Natural Resource Use: Experience of Canada. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2021;(4):169-179. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2021-4-169-179

Views: 470


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2413-2829 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9251 (Online)