SELF-ORGANIZATIONAL MODEL OF MANAGING IMPORT-SUBSTITUTION IN REGION
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2016-1-122-129
Abstract
The article discusses concepts of designing new models of managing import-substitution in the region by stimulating processes of self-organization of entrepreneurial structure through inter-branch movement of capitals and providing diversification of business. As conceptual positions of this structure pricing paradigm and vertical integration and glocalization are considered, which meet the requirements of system dynamics in conditions of restrictions in full. To realize the importance of methodological approaches to import-substitution the authors proceed from specific features of global economy of the 21st century that is affected by the so-called 'long tails'.
About the Authors
Sergey G. Tyaglov
Rostov University of Economics (RINH)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economics, Professor, the Head of the Department for Economics of Region, Industry and Enterprises of the Rostov University of Economics (RINH)
69 B. Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, 344002, Russian Federation
Aleksandr N. Kuzminov
South Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economics, Professor of the Department for HR Management of the South Federal University
105/42 B. Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, 344006, Russian Federation
References
1. Grandberg Z. Neoindustrial'naya paradigma i zakon vertikal'noy integratsii [Neo-Industrial Paradigm and the Law of Vertical Integration]. Ekonomist [Economist], 2009, No. 1, pp. 38–41. (In Russ.).
2. Gubanov S. Neoindustrializatsiya plyus vertikal'naya integratsiya (o formule razvitiya Rossii) [Neo-Industrialization Plus Vertical Integration (Formula of Russia Development)]. Ekonomist [Economist], 2008, No. 9, pp. 3–27. (In Russ.).
3. Kudrin B. I. Klassika tekhnicheskikh tsenozov. Obshchaya i prikladnaya tsenologiya [Classics of Technical Pricing. General and Applied Pricing]. Vyp. 31. Tsenologicheskie issledovaniya [Issue 31. Price Research]. Tomsk, TGU – Tsentr sistemnykh issledovaniy, 2006. (In Russ.).
4. Naymushin V. G. «Postindustrial'nye» illyuzii ili sistemnaya «neoindustriali-zatsiya»: vybor sovremennoy Rossii ['Post-Industrial' Illusions or System 'Neo-Industrialization': Choice of Modern Russia]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast], 2009, No. 2 (6), pp. 127–133. (In Russ.).
5. Bauman Z. Glocalization and Hybridity. Glocalism: journal of culture, politics and innovation University of Leeds, 2013, Vol. 1, pp. 12–25.
6. Cassiman B., Masako U. Optimal Project Rejection and New Firm Start-Ups. Management Science, 2006, No. 52, pp. 262–275.
7. Lawrence P. R. Organization and Environment Perspective. Van de Ven A. H. & Joyce W. F. Perspectives on Organizat Design and Behavior. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1981, pp. 311–345.
8. Romer P. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, No. 98, pp. 71–102.
9. Zagler M. Economic Growth, Structural Change, and Search Unemployment. Journal of Economics, 1998, No. 96, pp. 63–78.
Review
For citations:
Tyaglov S.G., Kuzminov A.N. SELF-ORGANIZATIONAL MODEL OF MANAGING IMPORT-SUBSTITUTION IN REGION. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2016;(1):122-129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2016-1-122-129
Views:
375
Email this article 