Preview

Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Advanced search

The Impact of Motivating Tariffs and Competition on Electric Power Market in OECD Country-Members

https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2022-3-86-96

Abstract

The positive impact of motivating tariffs on the development of renewable energy sources (RES) was confirmed by numerous empiric research. Similar impact of competition on electric power market has not been adequately studied. Current research shows the influence of competition on electric power market not only on the development of generation based on RES, but on the development of technologies of RES-generation and efficiency of relative mechanisms of state support. At the same time it should be mentioned that findings of research are not dubious.  By analyzing literature the author formulated a hypothesis about growing impact of motivating tariffs on RES development with higher competition on electric power market. To verify the hypothesis the author used information about an increase in capacity of wind and solar power stations (WPS and SPS) per capita of the population in OECD country-members in 2000–2018 as key drivers of RES development in the region. Findings of the research show that in OECD country-members with higher competition on electric power market the impact of motivating tariffs on the growth in WPS and SPS capacity was much higher. 

About the Author

A. V. Podlesnaya
Lomonosov Moscow State University; PAO NOVATEK
Russian Federation

Alina V. Podlesnaya Post-Graduate Student of the Department  for Competition and Industrial Policy  of the Faculty of Economics; Specialist of the Department for Internal Market Development 

1 Leninskie gory, Moscow, 119991

2 Udalcova Str., Moscow, 119415

  


References

1. Aghion P., Harris C., Howitt P., Vickers J. Competition, Imitation and Growth with Stepby-Step Innovation. The Review of Economic Studies, 2001, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 467–492.

2. Carley S. Distributed Generation: An Empirical Analysis of Primary Motivators. Energy Policy, 2009, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 1648–1659.

3. Carley S. State Renewable Energy Electricity Policies: An Empirical Evaluation of Effectiveness. Energy Policy, 2009, Vol. 37, No. 8, pp. 3071–3081.

4. Delmas M., Russo M. V., Montes-Sancho M. J. Deregulation and Environmental Differentiation in the Electric Utility Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 189–209.

5. Dijkgraaf E., van Dorp T. P., Maasland E. On the Effectiveness of Feed-in Tariffs in the Development of Solar Photovoltaics, The Energy Journal, 2018, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 81–99.

6. Klepper S. Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle. The American Economic Review, 1996, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 562–583.

7. Methodologies to Measure Market Competition, OECD Competition Committee Issues Paper, 2021. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/methodologies-tomeasure-market-competition-2021.pdf (accessed 06.01.2022).

8. Nesta L., Vona F., Nicolli F. Environmental Policies, Competition and Innovation in Renewable Energy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2014, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 396–411.

9. Polzin F., Egli F., Steffen B., Schmidt T. S. How do Policies Mobilize Private Finance for Renewable Energy? A systematic Review with an Investor Perspective. Applied Energy, 2019, Vol. 236, pp. 1249–1268.

10. Renewables 2021 Global Status Report. – Paris, 2021. Available at: https://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/GSR2021_Full_Report.pdf

11. Renewables 2011 Global Status Report. Paris, 2011. Available at: https://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/GSR2011_Full-Report_English.pdf

12. Sanyal P., Ghosh S. Product Market Competition and Upstream Innovation: Evidence from the US Electricity Market Deregulation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013, Vol. 95, No. 1, pp. 237–254.

13. Vitale C., Moiso C., Wanner I. OECD Product Market Regulation: a Detailed Explanation of the Methodology used to build the OECD PMR Indicators, 2020. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/economy/reform/A%20detailed%20explanation%20of%20the%20methodology%20used%20to%20build%20the%20OECD%20PMR%20indicators_FINAL.pdf (accessed 06.01.2022).

14. Winter S. G. Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1984, Vol. 5, No. 3-4, pp. 287–320.


Review

For citations:


Podlesnaya A.V. The Impact of Motivating Tariffs and Competition on Electric Power Market in OECD Country-Members. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2022;(3):86-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2022-3-86-96

Views: 239


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2413-2829 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9251 (Online)