Alternatives of Developing Technological Entrepreneurship in the World
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2022-5-116-125
Abstract
The article studies possible alternatives of developing technological entrepreneurship in Russia and in the world in view of scenario approach: territorial communications in the scale of Big Eurasia programs; upgrading raw material technologies, in particular, mass access of small forms of technological business to completion of worked-out wells and mines; developing service sector for global economy (construction, transport, education, recreation, etc.). In this case gradation of countries according to the level of entrepreneurship development is carried out. Four groups of countries are named: highly-developed, medium-developed, underdeveloped and countries of the ‘falling type’ (for example, Afghanistan, Haiti, Somali, etc.). Classical definition of technological entrepreneurship tasks was formulated: selection of ideas, organization of financing, commercialization and mass production. The significance of private sector as a principle driver of the innovation process was highlighted. Types of financing for technological innovation were systematized according to countries: venture, in-company, state and mixed. State-private partnership for this type of business was assessed. Examples were provided on the basis of Russian and Danish experience in the underground construction. The authors proposed a global pyramid of technological entrepreneurship describing levels of development hierarchy.
About the Authors
I. E. Belskikh
Volgograd branch of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Igor E. Belskikh Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor of the Department for Economics and Finance
Russian Federation
Igor E. Belskikh Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor of the Department for Economics and Finance
3 Volgodonskay Str., Volgograd, 400066
E. V. Kosobokova
Volgograd branch of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina V. Kosobokova PhD, Assistant Professor, Head of the Department for Economics and Finance
3 Volgodonskay Str., Volgograd, 400066
References
1. Balashova E. S., Gromova E. A. Tekhnologicheskoe predprinimatelstvo kak konkurentosposobnaya model innovatsionnogo razvitiya [Technological Entrepreneurship as a Competitive Model of Innovative Development]. Ekonomicheskie issledovaniya [Economic Research], 2016, No. 4, p. 1. (In Russ.).
2. Belskikh I. E., Peskova O. S., Borodina E. A. et al. Marketingovyy i predprinimatelskiy potentsial rossiyskikh universitetov kak «lokomotivy» regionalnogo ekonomicheskogo rosta [Marketing and Entrepreneurial Potential of Russian Universities as "Locomotives" of Regional Economic Growth]. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo [Economy and Entrepreneurship], 2018, No. 7 (96), pp. 752–754. (In Russ.).
3. Vasilenko A. V., Adzhiev D. O. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya mezhdunarodnoy torgovli [Modern Trends in the Development of International Trade]. Modern Science, 2021, No. 5-1, pp. 56–60. (In Russ.).
4. Votchel L. M., Vikulina V. V. Tekhnologicheskoe predprinimatelstvo i faktory ego razvitiya [Technological Entrepreneurship and Factors of its Development]. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo [Economics and Entrepreneurship], 2019, No. 12 (113), pp. 1185–1188. (In Russ.).
5. Doyl P. Marketing-menedzhment i strategiya [Marketing Management and Strategy]. Saint Petersburg, Piter, 2002. (In Russ.).
6. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika i tekhnologicheskoe predprinimatelstvo voydut v programmy vuzov RF [Innovative Economics and Technological Entrepreneurship will be Included in the Programs of Higher Educational Institutions of the Russian Federation]. Innovatsii [Innovations], 2017, No. 7 (225), pp. 16–18. (In Russ.).
7. Korchagin R. L. Spetsifika evolyutsii tekhnologicheskogo predprinimatelstva v razvivayushchikhsya i perekhodnykh stranakh [Specificity of the Evolution of Technological Entrepreneurship in Developing and Transitional Countries]. Innovatsii [Innovations], 2020, No. 12 (266), pp. 63–70. (In Russ.).
8. Nikulina O. V., Petrosyan S. A. Povyshenie konkurentosposobnosti uchastnikov mezhdunarodnoy torgovli na osnove tsifrovoy transformatsii deyatelnosti [Increasing the Competitiveness of International Trade Participants Based on Digital Transformation of Activities]. Ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Economy: Theory and Practice], 2020, No. 3 (59), pp. 51– 59. (In Russ.).
9. Porter M. Konkurentsiya [Competition]. Moscow, Izdatelskiy dom «Vilyams», 2003. (In Russ.).
10. Romanova A. I. Rol innovatsionnykh territorialnykh klasterov v realizatsii innovatsionnoy politiki Respubliki Tatarstan [The Role of Innovative Territorial Clusters in the Implementation of the Innovation Policy of the Republic of Tatarstan]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola [Siberian Financial School], 2018, No. 2 (127), pp. 94–100. (In Russ.).
11. Rynok e-commerce v Rossii: trendy i novye resheniya [The e-commerce Market in Russia: Trends and New Solutions]. (In Russ.). Available at: https://plus.rbc.ru/partners/5fd0cfff7a8aa90fc83656b1 (accessed 22.07.2021).
12. Savinov Yu. A., Kirillov V. N., Taranovskaya E. V. Srochno v nomer: vliyanie kitayskogo koronavirusa na mirovuyu ekonomiku i torgovlyu [Urgently to the Issue: the Impact of the Chinese Coronavirus on the World Economy and Trade]. Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomika [International Economics], 2020, No. 2, pp. 63–71. (In Russ.).
13. Smirnov E. N. Postpandemicheskie effekty dlya razvitiya mezhdunarodnoy torgovli [Post-Pandemic Effects for the Development of International Trade]. Rossiyskiy vneshneekonomicheskiy vestnik [Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin], 2021, No. 2, pp. 7–20. (In Russ.).
14. Tekhnologicheskoe predprinimatelstvo v innovatsionnoy ekonomike [Technological entrepreneurship in an innovative economy]. Nanoindustriya [Nanoindustry], 2016, No. 1 (63), pp. 62–65. (In Russ.).
15. Shults D. E., Kitchen F. Marketing. Integrirovannyy podkhod [Marketing. An integrated Approach]. Moscow, Infra-M, 2004. (In Russ.).
16. Yakushev N. O. Tekhnologicheskoe predprinimatelstvo v Rossii: problemy otsenki [Technological Entrepreneurship in Russia: Assessment Problems]. Voprosy territorialnogo razvitiya [Issues of Territorial Development], 2020, Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 3. (In Russ.).
17. Arogyaswamy B., Nowak A. High Tech and Societal Innovation in Poland: Prospects and Strategies. East-West Journal of Economics and Business, 2009, Vol. XII, Issue 1, pp. 47–73.
18. Meil P., Salzman H. Technological Entrepreneurship in India. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 2017, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 65–84.
19. Staniec I. Open Cooperation – the Future of Technological Entrepreneurship. Actual Problems of Economics, 2016, Vol. 182, No. 8, pp. 85–94.
20. Tomes A., Erol R., Armstrong P. Technological Entrepreneurship: Integrating Technological and Product Innovation. Technovation, 2000, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 115–127.
21. Venkataraman S. Regional Transformation through Technological Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 2004, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 153–167.
22. Watkins-Mathys L., Foster J. Entrepreneurship: the Missing Ingredient in China’s STIPs? Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. An International Journal, 2006, Vol. 18, Issue 3, pp. 249–274.
23. Zhang G., Peng X., Li J. Technological Entrepreneurship and Policy Environment: a Case of China. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 2008, Vol. 15, Issue 4, pp. 733–751.
Review
For citations:
Belskikh I.E., Kosobokova E.V. Alternatives of Developing Technological Entrepreneurship in the World. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2022;(5):116-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2022-5-116-125
Views:
403
Email this article 