Modeling Price Policy of Industries within the Frames of Inter-Sectoral Balance Methodology
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2024-1-40-55
Abstract
The subject of inter-sectoral balance has been adequately developed in scientific community, however, we think that insufficient attention was paid to inserting price rates of industries in the model of inter-sectoral relations, as they produce a serious impact on making decisions concerning each industry production. The article deals with working-out a mathematic approach to modeling industry behavior in view of price policy development. The theoretical base of the research was formed by key provisions of the economic theory and the theory of inter-sectoral balance. The authors analyze dynamics of product prices set by industries with regard to inter-sectoral dependence and respective changes in output, added value, margin and volumes of sold products in each industry. As a result of the research the inter-sectoral model of shaping price policy of industries was built, which takes into account parameters of demand and urge of every industry for maximum profits. Different scenarios of changing demand parameters and production interactions were studied. Model experiments allowed authors to come to the conclusion that a rise in demand for one industry product cannot always increase production of related industries. As product price in the industry goes up, costs of other industries also rise, which can have an adverse effect on their product demand on the part of end customer. And on the contrary, a drop in demand for one industry product can support other related industries on constant demand factors at the expense of cost cutting. The proposed model could be useful for private and state sectors in planning investment policy at the same time it could reveal macro-economic trends, which is necessary to resolve problems of tardy or inadequate response of business entity on possible risks.
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared based on the results of a study carried out with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 22-78-10150
About the Authors
N. A. Moiseev
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikita A. Moiseev, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor of the Department
Department for Mathematical Methods in Economics
109992
36 Stremyanny Lane
Moscow
I. A. Vnukov
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan A. Vnukov, Post-Graduate Student
Department for Mathematical Methods in Economics
109992
36 Stremyanny Lane
Moscow
References
1. Almon K. V chem vazhnost tablits «zatraty – vypusk»? [Why are Tables ‘Costs-Output’ Important]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Forecasting Problems], 2018, No. 6 (171), pp. 7–11. (In Russ.).
2. Gorbunov V. K. Model potrebitelskogo sprosa, osnovannaya na vektornom pole predpochteniy [The Customer Demand Model Based on Vector Field of Preferences]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Ekonomika [Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 6. Economics], 2009, No. 1, pp. 67–79. (In Russ.).
3. Granberg A. G., Suslov V. I., Suspitsyn S. A. Ekonomiko-matematicheskie issledovaniya mnogoregionalnykh sistem [Economic and Mathematic Research of Multi-Regional Systems]. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya [Region: Economics and Sociology], 2008, No. 2, pp. 120–150. (In Russ.).
4. Dondokov Z. B. D., Dyrkheev K. P. Opyt postroeniya i ispolzovaniya regionalnoy tablitsy «zatraty – vypusk» v analize ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona [The Experience of Plotting and Using Regional Table ‘Costs-Output’ in Analysis of Economic Development of Region]. Vserossiyskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya «Statistika i vyzovy sovremennosti» : sbornik materialov konferentsii «Den rabotnika statistiki» [All-Russian Conference ‘Statistics and Challenges of Our Times’ : collection of materials ‘The Day of Statistics Worker’]. Moscow, 2015, pp. 159–162. (In Russ.).
5. Ershov E. B. Razvitie i realizatsiya idey modeli mezhotraslevykh vzaimodeystviy dlya rossiyskoy ekonomiki [Development and Implementation of Ideas of Inter-Sectoral Relation Model for Russian Economy]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal VSHE [Economic Journal of VShE], 2008, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 3–28. (In Russ.).
6. Kalinin A. M., Koroteev S. S., Krupin A. A., Nefedov A. V. Tekhnologicheskaya importozavisimost rossiyskoy ekonomiki: otsenka s ispolzovaniem tablits «zatraty – vypusk» [Technological Import-Dependence of Russian Economy: Assessment by Tables ‘Costs – Output’]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Forecasting Problems], 2021, No. 1 (184), pp. 83–93. (In Russ.).
7. Kim I. A. Modelirovanie mezhotraslevykh potokov v simmetrichnykh tablitsakh «zatraty – vypusk» Rossii (1995–2002 gg.). Diss. kand. ekon. nauk [Modeling Inter-Sectoral Flows in Symmetric Tables ‘Costs – Output’ in Russia (1995–2002). PhD econ. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2006. (In Russ.).
8. Kim I. A. Postroenie sistem tablits «zatraty – vypusk» Rossii dlya 1995–2003 gg. v «smeshannoy» nomenklature OKONKH – OKVED [Plotting Systems of Tables ‘Costs – Output’ in Russian for 1995–2003 in ‘Mixed’ Assortment OKONH – OKVED]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal VSHE [Economic Journal VShE], 2011, No. 3, pp. 336–352. (In Russ.).
9. Leontev V. V. Ekonomicheskie esse. Teorii, issledovaniya, fakty i politika [Economic Essays. Theories, Research, Facts and Policy]. Moscow, 1990. (In Russ.).
10. Melnikova L. V. Tablitsy «zatraty – vypusk»: put k sblizheniyu natsiy [Tables ‘Costs – Output’: Way to Get Nations Closer]. EKO, 2011, No. 5 (443), pp. 27–33. (In Russ.).
11. Moiseev N. A., Akhmadeev B. A. Algoritm otsenki importozameshcheniya na osnove tablits zatrat – vypuska [Algorithm of Assessing Import-Substitution on the Basis of Tables Costs-Output]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2021, No. 3 (117), pp. 117–129. (In Russ.).
12. Motorin V. I. Lineynye funktsii proizvodstvennykh zatrat v pryamougolnykh tablitsakh i modelyakh «zatraty – vypusk» [Linear Functions of Production Costs in Rectangular Tables and Models ‘Costs – Output’]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov IMEI [Collection of academic works of IMEI], 2016, No. 1, pp. 344–362. (In Russ.).
13. Nikiforova P. N. Ispolzovanie tablits «zatraty – vypusk» v sovremennoy nauke [Studying Tables ‘Costs – Output’ in Today’s Science]. Vestnik sovremennykh issledovaniy [Bulletin of Current Research], 2018, No. 5.4 (20), pp. 272–273. (In Russ.).
14. Rudnev Yu. A. Otsenka tesnoty ekonomicheskikh svyazey stran s pomoshchyu tablits «zatraty – vypusk» [Assessing Closeness of Economic Links of Countries with the Help of Tables ‘Costs – Output’]. Bolshaya Evraziya: razvitie, bezopasnost, sotrudnichestvo [Large Eurasia: Development, Security, Cooperation], 2018, pp. 249–255. (In Russ.).
15. Uzyakov M. N. Problemy postroeniya mezhotraslevoy modeli ravnovesiya rossiyskoy ekonomiki [The Problem of Developing Inter–Sectoral Model of Russian Economy Balance]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Forecasting Problems], 2000, No. 2, pp. 1–14. (In Russ.).
16. Shamshin V. N. Tablitsy V. V. Leonteva: «zatraty – vypusk» i ikh primenenie k rynochnoy ekonomike [Leontiev’s Tables ‘Costs – Output’ and their Use in Market Economy]. Evropeyskiy zhurnal ekonomicheskikh nauk i upravleniya [European Journal of Economics and Management], 2022, No. 1, pp. 44–51. (In Russ.).
17. Yakovenko D. N. Primenenie lineynoy algebry pri modelirovanii ekonomicheskikh protsessov [Using Linear Algebra in Modeling Economic Processes]. Alleya nauki [Alley of Science], 2018, Vol. 5, No. 6 (22), pp. 270–273. (In Russ.).
18. Yaremenko Yu. V. Strukturnye izmeneniya v sotsialisticheskoy ekonomike [Structural Changes in Socialist Economics]. Moscow, Mysl, 1981. (In Russ.).
19. Bazzazan F., Batey P. The Development and Empirical Testing of Extended Input-Output Price Models. Economic Systems Research, 2003, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 69–86.
20. De Boer P. M. C., Donkers H. W. J. On the Relationship Between Input-Output Production Coefficients and the CES Production Function. Zeitschrift Für Nationalökonomie. Journal of Economics, 1985, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 331–335.
21. Ershov Yu. S., Ibragimov N. M., Dushenin A. I. Input-Output Table Regionalization and Multiregional Input-Output Model Development Algorithm. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2021, Vol. 14, No. 7, pp. 1018–1027.
22. Kratena K. Prices and Factor Demand in an Endogenized Input-Output Model. Economic Systems Research, 2005, Vol. 17, pp. 47–56.
23. Kratena K., Temursho U. Dynamic Econometric Input-Output Modeling: New Perspectives. Regional Research Frontiers, 2017, Vol. 2, pp. 3–21.
24. Meyer C. D. Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra. Philadelphia, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2000, Vol. 12.
25. Miller R. E., Blair P. D. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. Cambridge, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 10–68.
26. Reyes A. F., Mendoza M. А. M. The Demand Driven and the Supply-Sided Input-Output Models. Notes for the Debate. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. MPRA Paper, 2013, pp. 1–25.
27. Sharify N., Sancho F. A New Approach for the Input-Output Price Model. Economic Modelling, 2011, Vol. 28, No. 1–2, pp. 188–195.
28. Theil H. Linear Aggregation in Input-Output Analysis. Econometrica, 1957, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 111–122.
29. Tilanus C. B. Marginal Versus Average Input Coefficients in Input-Output Forecasting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1967, Vol. 81, No. 1, pp. 140–145.
30. Timmer M. P., Dietzenbacher E., Los B., Stehrer R., de Vries G. J. An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Database: the Case of Global Automotive Production. Review of International Economics, 2015, Vol. 23, pp. 575–605.
Review
For citations:
Moiseev N.A., Vnukov I.A. Modeling Price Policy of Industries within the Frames of Inter-Sectoral Balance Methodology. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2024;(1):40-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2024-1-40-55
Views:
268
Email this article 