Policy of Small Town Development: Lessons of Overseas Experience for Russia

   The article studies the world experience in pursuing state policy of space development in remote territories and small towns in Germany, Japan, Poland, Slovenia, Check Republic and Italy. The article describes experience of these countries in developing territories characterized by depopulation, reducing real sector of economy and jobs, declining standard of living, rising costs of social infrastructure. It also analyzes dynamic of priorities in policy of territorial development depending on predominant academic concepts: from policy of leveling-up, developing endogenous factors of territories (policy established in the spot) to policy beyond growth limits. Negative experience of developing Check municipalities was shown and results of certain stages of policy in countries that could not reach the set goals were highlighted. On the basis of the analysis some common approaches were found, as well as tools, which proved their effectiveness in testing this experience for small towns in Russia. By analyzing practices of six overseas countries the author came to the conclusion that small towns often experience after-effects of urbanization, such as population outflow, its aging and economic stagnation. The most important conditions of pursuing state policy on such territories are as follows: search for finance sources for their support, maintenance of infrastructure and improvement of quality of state service rendering and creation of sources of endogenous development. Today we can observe the development of such concepts as ‘The Slow Town’ (Italy), ‘Life beyond Growth’ (Japan) that aim at shaping living conditions for people focusing on benefits of remote territories. At the same time trends of developing small towns advance specific requirements to implementing state branch policies, in particular, in the field of education, public health service, to new formats of rendering basic services, including remote territories in conditions of their low budget support.

1. Atkisson A. Life Beyond Growth. Alternatives and Complements to GDPmeasured. Growth as a Framing Concept for Social Progress. 2012 Annual survey report of the Institute for Studies in Happiness, Economy, and Society (ISHES). Tokyo, Japan, 2012.

2. Bailey C., Miles S., Stark P. Culture-Led Urban Regeneration and the Revitalisation of Identities in Newcastle, Gateshead and the North East of England. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 2004, Vol. 10, pp. 47–65.

3. Bański J. Dilemmas of Regional and Local Development. London, 2020.

4. Barca F., McCann P., Rodríguez-Pose A. The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-Based Versus Place-Neutral Approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 2012, Vol. 52 (1), pp. 134–152.

5. Bell D. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: a Venture in Social Forecasting. New York, Basic Books, 1973.

6. Castells M. The Informational City. Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban-Regional Process. Oxford, Blackwell, 1989.

7. Clark T. N., Lloyd R., Wong K. K., Jain P. Amenities Drive Urban Growth. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2002, Vol. 24, Issue 5, pp. 493–515.

8. Combes P.-P., Duranton G., Gobillon L. et al. The Productivity Advantages of Large Cities: Distinguishing Agglomeration from Firm Selection. Econometrica, 2012, Vol. 80, pp. 2543–2594.

9. Florida R. L. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York, Basic Books, 2003.

10. Fol S., Cunningham-Sabot E. Déclin urbain et shrinking cities: Une évaluation critique des approches de la décroissance urbaine. Annales de Geographie, 2010, Vol. 674, pp. 359–383.

11. Gwosdz K., Domański B., Bilska-Wodecka E. Localised Capabilities as an Intermediating Factor in the Transition from an Old to a New Development Path: The Case of Post-Socialist Industrial Towns. Moravian Geographical Reports, 2020, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 123–135.

12. Hornek J., Jüptner P. Endangered Municipalities? Case Study of Three Small and Critically Indebted Czech Municipalities. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 2020, Vol. 13, Issue 1, pp. 35–59.

13. Knox P., Mayer H. Small Town Sustainability: Economic, Social, and Environmental Innovation. Germany, Walter de Gruyter, 2013.

14. Landry C. The Creative City: A toolkit for Urban Innovators. London, Earthscan, 2000.

15. Mally K. V., Bobovnik N., Kimovec L., Lampič B. Changes in (Sustainable) Development of Slovenian Small Towns. European Countryside, 2022, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 87–103.

16. Marans R. W. Quality of Urban Life & Environmental Sustainability Studies: Future Linkage Opportunities. Habitat International, 2015, Vol. 45, pp. 47–52.

17. Martinez-Fernandez C., Audirac I., Fol S., Cunningham-Sabot E. Shrinking Cities: Urban Challenges of Globalization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2012, Vol. 36 (2), pp. 213–225.

18. Peters D. J., Hamideh S., Zarecor K. E., Ghandour M. Using Entrepreneurial Social Infra-structure to Understand Smart Shrinkage in Small Towns. Journal of Rural Studies, 2018, Vol. 64, pp. 39–49.

19. Radstrom S. A Placesustaining Framework for Local Urban Identity: an Introduction and History of Cittaslow. Italian Journal of Planning Practice, 2011, Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 90–113.

20. Sassen S. The Global City. New York; London; Tokyo, Princeton University Press, 1991.

21. Scott A. J. The Cultural Economy of Cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1997, Vol. 21 (2), pp. 323–339.

22. Urso G. Polycentric Development Policies: A Reflection on the Italian “National Strategy for Inner Areas”. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, Vol. 223, pp. 456–461.

23. Winden van W. Knowledge and the European City. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2010, Vol. 101, Issue 1, pp. 100–106.

24. Wirth P., Elis V., Müller B., Yamamoto K. Peripheralisation of Small Towns in Germany and Japan – Dealing with Economic Decline and Population Loss. Journal of Rural Studies, 2016, Vol. 47, pp. 62–75.