Classification of Management Models in the Field of Physical Culture and Sports
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2025-3-211-222
Abstract
The article provides analysis of management models in the field of physical culture and sports, studies opinions and findings of works by different authors on this subject. Key features of management models in the field of physical culture and sports were highlighted and their differences were demonstrated. A new classification of management models in the field of physical culture and sports was put forward, it is based on analysis of world and home practices. The article gives characteristic of models, whose functioning takes place on the basis of the role of every key management entity in the field of physical culture and sports and interaction between state, public and private sectors. The classification also describes possible configurations in case of mixing of management models in the field of physical culture and sports. Key conditions of each model functioning and factors of their use in practice were depicted. Findings of the analysis can be used in practice to build management model in the field of physical culture and sports in the Russian Federation.
About the Author
I. A. AbramyanRussian Federation
Ishkhan A. Abramyan Post-Graduate student of the Department of Sports and Active Leisure Management
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 109992
References
1. Abramyan I. A. Issledovanie opyta Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respubliki upravleniya sferoy fizicheskoy kultury i sporta [Researching Experience of the Chinese Peoples’ Republic in Managing the Field of Physical Culture and Sports]. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo [Economics and Entrepreneurship], 2023, No. 8 (157), pp. 179–184. (In Russ.).
2. Altukhov S. V. Ivent-menedzhment v sporte. Upravlenie sportivnymi meropriyatiyami [Event-Management in Sports. Managing Sport Events]. Moscow, Sovetskiy sport, 2013. (In Russ.).
3. Kylasov A. V. Okoltsovanniy sport. Istoki i smysl sovremennogo olimpizma: esse po istorii sporta i olimpizma [Ringed Sport. Sources and Sense of Today’s Olympism: Essay on History of Sports and Olympism]. Moscow, AIRO-XXI, 2010. (In Russ.).
4. Kylasov A. V. Sportivnoe nasledie: institutsionalizatsiya i kontekst [Sport Heritage: Institutionalism and Context]. Moscow, Russian D. Likhachev Research Institute of Cultural and Natural Heritage, 2022. (In Russ.).
5. Kylasov A. V. Etnosport. Rukovodstvo polzovatelya (traktat), monografiya [Ethno-Sport. User’s Guidance (Treatise): monograph]. Moscow, Sport, 2023. (In Russ.).
6. Ponkin I. V., Redkina A. I. Klassifikatsiya kak metod nauchnogo issledovaniya, v chastnosti v yuridicheskoy nauke [Classification as a Method of Academic Research, in Particular, in Juridical Science]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki [Bulletin of the Perm University. Juridical Sciences], 2017, Issue 37, pp. 249–259. (In Russ.).
7. Rozova S. S. Klassifikatsionnaya problema v sovremennoy nauke [Classification Problem in Current Science]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1986. (In Russ.).
8. Syrykh V. M. Podgotovka dissertatsiy po yuridicheskim naukam: nastolnaya kniga soiskatelya [Preparing Dissertation on Juridical Sciences: Candidate Guide-Book]. Moscow, RAP, 2012. (In Russ.).
9. Chaker A.-N. Bonne gouvernance dans le sport. Une etude europeenne. Strasbourg, Editions du Conseil de l'Europe, 2004.
10. Henry I. European Models of Sport: Governance, Organisational Change and Sports Policy in the EU. Hitotsubashi Journal of Arts and Sciences, 2009, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 41– 52.
11. Sauer R. D. Sport, the State, and the Market. Potsdam, Germany, 2008.
Review
For citations:
Abramyan I.A. Classification of Management Models in the Field of Physical Culture and Sports. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2025;(3):211-222. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2025-3-211-222