SCIENTIFIC INTERPRETATION AND INNOVATION ECONOMY METHODOLOGY
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2017-4-3-12
Abstract
The main idea of the article is that there is no alternative for the innovation way of Russia’s development. However, this statement is questionable. The problem is there is no scientifically grounded innovation mechanism either in Russia or abroad. The article provides a scientific definition of the term ‘innovation’, shows signs which can characterize innovation economy and puts forward its methodology. The authors prove that the fundamental basis of innovation economy at the enterprise can be only amortization. On this basis the fund of innovation costs can be formed in the profit, which could release this part of the profit from taxation. Western countries proposed EBITDA index but it has not been scientifically substantiated.
About the Authors
Lidia I. Kochurova
Kemerovo Institute (branch) of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department.
39 Kuznetsky Av., Kemerovo, 650992
Evgeniy I. Kharlampenkov
Kemerovo Institute (branch) of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department.
39 Kuznetsky Av., Kemerovo, 650992
Viktor V. Andreev
Expert of the FSSR CC.
6/9 Chistoprudniy Boul., Moscow, 101000
Russian Federation
Federal Service of State Registration, Cadastre and Cartography
Russian Federation
Federal Service of State Registration, Cadastre and Cartography
References
1. Vechkanov G. Planirovanie kak sistema i metod upravleniya [Planning as a System and Method of Management]. Ekonomist [Economist], 2012, No. 12, pp. 3–15. (In Russ.).
2. Vishnevskiy V. Teoriya stoimosti v ekonomicheskoy nauke [The Theory of Cost in Economic Science]. Ekonomist [Economist], 2007, No. 5, pp. 35–45. (In Russ.).
3. Gogolev A. K. Problemy amortizatsii v usloviyakh inflyatsii [Problems of Amortization in Conditions of Inflation]. Bukhgalterskiy uchet [Accounting], 1996, No. 10, pp. 14–16. (In Russ.).
4. Zhukov A. Stimulirovanie innovatsionnoy deyatel'nosti malogo i srednego biznesa [Stimulating Innovation Activity at Small and Medium-Size Business]. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Economics Journal], 2007, No. 4, pp. 8–14. (In Russ.).
5. Ivanchenko V., Fokin Yu. Fond amortizatsii: voprosy formirovaniya i ispol'zovaniya [Amortization Fund: Establishment and Usage]. Ekonomist [Economist], 1997, No. 2, pp. 28–35. (In Russ.).
6. Kochurova L. I. Innovatsionnaya model' gosudarstvennogo upravleniya natsional'noy ekonomikoy na printsipakh razvitogo rynka [The Innovation Model of State Governance of National Economy on Principles of Developed Market]. Kemerovo, Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2015. (In Russ.).
7. Marx K., Engels F. Collection of works, 2nd edition, Vol. 26, Part III; Vol. 25, Part II; Vol. 39; Vol. 46, Part I. (In Russ.).
8. Matskulyak I. D. O den'gakh i denezhnykh otnosheniyakh [Concerning Money and Monetary Relations]. Finansovaya ekonomika [Finance Economics], 2014, No. 1, pp. 7–24. (In Russ.).
9. Moskvin V. A. Upravlenie kachestvom v biznese, rekomendatsii dlya rukovoditeley predpriyatiy, bankov i risk-menedzherov [Quality Management in Business: Recommendations for Executives of Enterprises, Banks and Risk-Managers]. Moscow, Finance and Statistics, 2006. (In Russ.).
10. Novodvorskiy V. D., Khorin A. N. O novykh podkhodakh k metodam amortizatsii osnonykh sredstv [About New Approaches to Methods of Amortization of Fixed Assets]. Bukhgalterskiy uchet [Accounting], 1996, No. 7, pp. 37–40. (In Russ.).
11. Rayzberg B. A., Lozovskiy L. Sh., Starodubtseva E. B. Sovremennyy ekonomicheskiy slovar' [The Current Economics Dictionary]. Moscow, Infra-M, 1999. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kochurova L.I., Kharlampenkov E.I., Andreev V.V. SCIENTIFIC INTERPRETATION AND INNOVATION ECONOMY METHODOLOGY. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2017;(4):3-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2017-4-3-12
Views:
400
Email this article 