AGENT-BASED MODELLING: STATE AND PROSPECTS
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2017-6-155-162
Abstract
The article describes the current condition of agent modeling – a new direction in imitation modeling, which is very important as a tool of researching complicated heterogeneous decentralized socio-economic systems. Key spheres of using agent models were identified and researched, examples of models starting from first attempts of building them to today’s achievements of science both in Russian and abroad were provided. By analyzing the current condition of agent modeling the author discusses existing problems and shows further prospects of developing agent modeling.
About the Author
Eduard A. Lebedyuk
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Post-Graduate Student of the Department for Mathematical Methods in Economics
Address: 36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
References
1. Kartvelishvili V. M., Lebedyuk E. A. Stimuly i matematicheskaya model' vzaimosvyazi emotsiy ekonomicheskikh sub'ektov [Incentives and Mathematic Model of Emotion Interrelation of Economic Entities]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2016, No. 4 (88), pp. 113–126. (In Russ.).
2. Kartvelishvili V. M., Lebedyuk E. A. Programmnye sredstva modelirovaniya emotsional'nogo tona sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo vzaimodeystviya sub'ektov [Software of Modeling Emotional Tone of Social and Economic Interaction of Entities]. Menedzhment i biznesadministrirovanie [Management and Business Administration], 2015, No. 3, pp. 132–136. (In Russ.).
3. Klaus N. G. Primenenie agentnogo modelirovaniya v analize sotsial'nykh konfliktov. Model' «Dve etnicheskie gruppirovki. Predotvrashchenie genotsida» [Applying Agent Modeling in Analyzing Social Conflicts. The Model “Two Ethnic Groups. Preventing Genocide”]. Metodologiya, teoriya i istoriya sotsiologii, sbornik nauchnykh statey [Methodology, Theory and History of Sociology, collection of articles], in 3 vol., edited by V. I. Filonenko. Rostov na Donu, Publishing House YuFU, 2012, Vol. 2, pp. 57–65. (In Russ.).
4. Cederman L. Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve. Princeton University Press, 1997.
5. Deffuant G., Amblard F., Weisbuch G., Faure T. How Can Extremism Prevail? A Study Based on the Relative Agreement Interaction Model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2002, Vol. 5, No. 4.
6. Galan J. Errors and Artefacts in Agent-Based Modelling. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2008, Vol. 12, No. 1.
7. Gilbert N., Pyka A., Ahrweiler P. Innovation Networks – A Simulation Approach. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2001, Vol. 4, No. 3.
8. Izquierdo S., Izquierdo R. The Impact of Quality Uncertainty without Asymmetric Information on Market Efficiency. Journal of Business Research, 2007, Vol. 60, pp. 858–867.
9. Janssen M., Jager W. An Integrated Approach to Simulating Behavioural Processes: A Case Study of the Lock-In of Consumption Patterns. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1999, Vol. 2, No. 2.
10. Macal C., North M. Tutorial on Agent-Based Modelling and Simulation. Journal of Simulation, 2010, Vol. 4, pp. 151–162.
11. Schelling T. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. WW Norton and Company, 1978.
12. Strader T. Simulation of Order Fulfillment in Divergent Assembly Supply Chains. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1998, Vol. 1, No. 2.
Review
For citations:
Lebedyuk E.A. AGENT-BASED MODELLING: STATE AND PROSPECTS. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2017;(6):155-162. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2017-6-155-162
Views:
795
Email this article 