BUSINESS – MARKET AS A MARKET WITH NO PROSPECTS
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2018-2-16-29
Abstract
High-level technologies were brought to our planet in the 20th and early 21st century. In the technical aspect mankind has made a great step forward while science about market is still underdeveloped. Thus, instead of the developed form of market relations mankind has reached business – market, the most perverted form of market in human history. The article proved that business – market could be dangerous for people. It will never become a model for social and economic structure of state. Arising of business – market is connected with the fact that countries could not develop a controlled market as there is no science. Business – market is a consequence of the fact that science cannot see a developed form of market. It is business – market that has pushed world economy to the global crisis. If we speak about the essence of the crisis, it was initially provoked by the US. The first precondition of the global crisis was stock exchanges. While stock exchange was working within economic space of countries, it had a positive impact, but as soon as it overstepped state limits it gained a negative impact. Principle elements of the national market are not stock exchanges, but goods, money and value. Commercialization was the second precondition of the crisis. Commercial banks are harmful for any state. As the bank becomes state-owned the ground for enrichment of crisis culprit will disappear. The non-governmental structure of the Federal Reserve System controls finances of the world. This global money-lender is controlled by no one. A crisis is a response to the incorrect pursuing of economy. All countries of the world need economic activity coordinated with economic laws. It is necessary to restructure our state into the developed form of market and then Russia will be able to overcome the crisis and build a controlled market.
About the Author
Lidia I. KochurovaRussian Federation
PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department for Economics
39 Kuznetsky Av., Kemerovo, 650992
References
1. Anan'in O. Mozhet li nauka byt' rukovodstvom k deystviyu? [Can Science be a Guide to Action?]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Issues of Economics], 2001, No. 2, pp. 48–63. (In Russ.).
2. Birzhevoy portfel' [Exchange Portfolio], edited by Yu. B. Rubin, V. I. Soldatkin. Moscow, SOMINTEK, 1992. (In Russ.).
3. Gerashchenko V. V. Sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya rossiyskoy i mirovoy valyutnofinansovoy sistemy v usloviyakh krizisa [The Situation and Prospects of Development of Russian and Global Monetary and Finance System in Crisis]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo torgovo-ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Russian State Trade and Economics University], 2009, No. 10 (37), pp. 13–19. (In Russ.).
4. Iokhin V. Ya. Razmyshleniya v poiskakh istiny [Reflections in Search for Truth]. Filosof khozyaystva – 2 (k 10-letiyu zhurnala «Filosofiya khozyaystva») [Economy Philosopher – 2 (to the 10th anniversary of the journal ‘Economy Philosophy’)], edited by E. S. Zotova. Moscow, Ekaterinburg, Publishing house of UrTISI, 2009. (In Russ.).
5. Iokhin V. Ya. Teoreticheskaya nesostoyatel'nost' i besperspektivnost' «Ekonomiks» [Theoretical Groundlessness and Hopelessness of ‘Economics’]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo torgovo-ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Russian State Trade and Economics University], 2008, No. 3 (24). (In Russ.).
6. Mal'kovskaya I. A. Vyzovy identichnosti i krizis sotsial'nosti [Challenges of Identity and Crisis of Sociality]. Filosofiya khozyaystva. Al'manakh Tsentra obshchestvennykh nauk i ekonomicheskogo fakul'teta MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova. 2005. Spetsial'nyy vypusk. Fenomen novogo cheloveka: vospitanie, samovospitanie i inovospitanie, materialy nauchnoy konferentsii [Economy Philosophy. Anthology of the Center for Public Science and Economics Faculty of the Moscow State University. 2005. Special Issue. Phenomenon of New Man: Upbringing, Self-Upbringing and Ino-Upbringing, materials of the Conference]. Moscow, 2005. (In Russ.).
7. Marx K., Engels F. Collection of works, 2nd edition, Vol. 46, Part 2. (In Russ.). 8. Novaya ekonomika [New Economics], edited by E. F. Avdokushin, V. S. Sizov. Moscow, Magistr, 2009. (In Russ.).
8. Osipov Yu. M. Sovremennaya Rossiya: bremya peremen [Present Day Russia: the Burden of Changes]. Moscow, TEIS, 2009. (In Russ.).
9. Postmodernovyy mir i Rossiya [Post-Modern World and Russia], eds. by Yu. M. Osipov, O. V. Inshakov, M. M. Guzev, E. S. Zotova. Moscow, Volgograd, Publishing house of the Volgograd University, 2004. (In Russ.).
10. Starikov N. Krizis: Kak eto delaetsya [Crisis: How it is Done]. Saint Petersburg, Piter, 2009. (In Russ.).
11. Fidel' Kastro Dias-Balart. Pochetnyy doktor Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo torgovoekonomicheskogo universiteta Fidel' Kastro Rus [Fidel Castro Dias-Balart. Fidel Castro Russ, the Honoured Doctor of the Russian State Trade and Economics University]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo torgovo-ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Russian State Trade and Economics University], 2009, No. 10 (37), pp. 9–12. (In Russ.).
12. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya v XXI veke – 1(8): Ekonomika Postmoderna [Economic Theory in the 21st Century – 1 (8): Post-Modern Economics], edited by Yu. M. Osipov, O. V. Inshakov, E. S. Zotova. Moscow, Ekonomist, 2004. (In Russ.).
13. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya v XXI veke – 6(13): Den'gi [Economic Theory in the 21st Century – 6 (13): Money], edited by Yu. M. Osipov, E. S. Zotova. Moscow, TEIS, 2007. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kochurova L.I. BUSINESS – MARKET AS A MARKET WITH NO PROSPECTS. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2018;(2):16-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2018-2-16-29