INDICATIVE PLANNING: DEFINITION AND RUSSIAN PRACTICE
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2015-4-104-113
Abstract
The article considers possibilities of using indicative planning to modernize Russian economy. Topicality of the subject is connected with problems facing our country in conditions of changing price proportions and altering international chains of cooperation. The authors came to the conclusion that indicative planning implies three different approaches to planning and economy management: information-oriented, organizational and program-targeted. By analyzing the practice of budget programming existing in our country they draw a conclusion that program-targeted approach to planning has serious drawbacks exacerbated by subjective errors in its use. In authors' point of view the most suitable for our country approach is organizational which combines well-balanced economic planning and the system of state regulation of economy.
About the Authors
Elena V. Ustyuzhanina
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economics, Professor, the Head of the Department for Economic Theory of the PRUE
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
Sergey G. Evsyukov
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Federal Budget Institution of Science of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department for Economic Theory of the PRUE; Senior Researcher of the Federal Budget Institution of Science of the Russian Academy of Sciences
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
47 Nakhimov Av., Moscow, 117418, Russian Federation
References
1. Buzgalin A., Kolganov A. Obshchenatsional'noe planirovanie: perezagruzka [National Planning: Re-Loading]. Al'ternativy [Alternatives], 2015, No. 1 (86), pp. 52–69. (In Russ.).
2. Vvedenie v teoriyu i metodologiyu sistemy optimal'nogo funktsionirovaniya sotsialisti-cheskoy ekonomiki [Introduction to the Theory and Methodology of the System of Optimal Functioning of Socialist Economy], edited by N. P. Fedorenko, Yu. V. Ovsienko, N. Ya. Petrakov. Moscow, Nauka, 1983. (In Russ.).
3. Kaplan R., Norton D. Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazateley: ot strategii k deystviyu [Balanced System of Figures: from Strategy to Action]. Moscow, Olimpiya-Biznes, 2010. (In Russ.).
4. Polterovich V. M. Kuda idti: dvadtsat' chetyre tezisa [Where to Go: 24 Theses]. Ekonomi-cheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii [Economics of Today's Russia], 2014, No. 3 (66), pp. 7–16. (In Russ.).
5. Ustyuzhanina E. V., Evsyukov S. G., Panfilov F. A. Byudzhetnoe programmirovanie kak sposob realizatsii strategii razvitiya rossiyskoy ekonomiki [Budget Programming as a Way to Pursue the Strategy of Developing Russian Economy]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopas-nost' [National Interests: Priorities and Security], 2014, No. 36 (273), pp. 2–13. (In Russ.).
6. Ouchi W. G. Theory Z. Reading. MA, Addison – Wesley, 1981.
Review
For citations:
Ustyuzhanina E.V., Evsyukov S.G. INDICATIVE PLANNING: DEFINITION AND RUSSIAN PRACTICE. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2015;(4):104-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2015-4-104-113
Views:
1128
Email this article 