Assessing the knowledge index of the region
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2019-2-130-141
Abstract
Economy of knowledge is an economic formation, where today’s generation of young people will work. It is quite good that many scientists try to forecast what it will be like. The article studies different approaches to assessment of regional knowledge index. The authors put forward a new methodology of its estimation on the basis of key matrix determinant and its logarithming. To assess the knowledge index 16 indicators divided into 4 groups are used and they gave an opportunity to build a four-dimensional matrix. According to the author, this approach is more objective and can eliminate some inaccuracy of methods designed by other authors. On the basis of this methodology the knowledge index was estimated, which shows conditions for shaping economy of knowledge in Russian regions. The rating of federal districts and regions-leaders was built and regions-outsiders in respect of economy of knowledge shaping were identified. Indicators that exert the most serious effect (positive and negative) on the knowledge index of regions were found. More detailed results for the whole period of analysis – 2000–2015 – for all regions of the Russian Federation can be found in the Situational Center of the Russian Plekhanov University of Economics.
About the Author
S. N. KukushkinRussian Federation
Sergey N. Kukushkin - PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department for Industrial Economics.
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997.
References
1. Bortnik I. M., Barinova V. A., Zemtsov S. P., Infimovskaya S. Yu., Sorokina A. V. Analiz faktorov konkurentosposobnosti otechestvennykh vysokotekhnologichnykh kompaniy [Analyzing Factors of Home Highly-Technological Companies’ Competitiveness]. Innovatsii [Innovation], 2015, No. 3 (197), pp. 25–31. (In Russ.).
2. Dotsenko E. Yu., Zhironkina O. V., Agafonov F. V., Genin A. E. Rol' konvergentnykh tekhnologiy v stanovlenii nepreryvnogo blagopoluchiya v neoindustrial'noy ekonomike [The Role of Convergent Technologies in Establishing Continuous Wellbeing in Neo-Industrial Economy]. Putevoditel' predprinimatelya [Guide-Book of the Businessman], 2016, No. 32, pp. 65– 79. (In Russ.).
3. Zhironkin S. A. Teoreticheskie osnovy i napravleniya strukturnogo regulirovaniya ekonomiki Rossii [Theoretical Foundations and Lines of Structural Regulation in Economy of Russia]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Journal of Economic Theory], 2011, No. 1, pp. 74–80. (In Russ.).
4. Zhironkin S. A., Gasanov M. A. Neoindustrial'naya kontseptsiya strukturnykh preobrazovaniy rossiyskoy ekonomiki [Neo-Industrial Concept of Structural Reforming of Russian Economy]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika [Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. Economics], 2014, No. 4 (28), pp. 14–24. (In Russ.).
5. Zemtsov S. P., Komarov V. M. Formirovanie ekonomiki znaniy v regionakh Rossii v 1998–2012 gg. [Shaping Economy of Knowledge in Russian Regions in 1998-2012]. Innovatsii [Innovation], 2015, No. 10, pp. 29–38. (In Russ.).
6. Kalenov O. E. Innovatsionno-tekhnologicheskoe razvitie organizatsii. Perspektivy ekonomiki znaniy, monografiya [Innovation-Technological Development of the Organization. Prospects of Economy of Knowledge, monograph]. Moscow, Impul's, 2019. (In Russ.).
7. Kalenov O. E. Rol' tekhnoparkovykh struktur v protsesse integratsii gornodobyvayushchikh regionov v ekonomiku znaniy [The Role of Techno-Park Structures in Integrating Mining Regions in Economy of Knowledge]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2019, No. 1 (103), pp. 96–104. (In Russ.).
8. Kalenov O. E. Kharakteristiki i osobennosti virtual'nykh organizatsiy [Characteristics and Specific Features of Virtual Organizations]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2018, No. 5 (101), pp. 117–123. (In Russ.).
9. Kurakova N. G., Zinov V. G., Tsvetkov L. A., Eremchenko O. A., Komarova A. V., Komarov V. M., Sorokina A. V., Pavlova P. N., Kotsyubinskiy V. A. Natsional'naya nauchnotekhnologicheskaya politika «bystrogo reagirovaniya»: rekomendatsii dlya Rossii (analiticheskiy doklad) [National Scientific and technological Policy of ‘Quick Response’: Recommendations for Russia (analytical report)]. Moscow, Delo, 2014. (In Russ.).
10. Nordstrem K. A., Ridderstrale Y. Biznes v stile fank. Kapital plyashet pod dudku kapitala [Business in Fanck Style. Capital Dances to Capital’s Tune: translated from English], translated from English. Saint Petersburg, Stockholm School in St. Petersburg, 2003. (In Russ.).
11. Yankovskaya V. V. Vliyanie innovatsionnoy modeli upravleniya na razvitie regionov RF [The Impact of Innovation Model of Management on Russian Regions’ Development]. Saarbryukken, LAP LAMBERT, 2015. (In Russ.).
12. Yankovskaya V. V. Innovatsionnaya model' razvitiya moskovskogo regiona [Innovation Model of the Moscow Region Development]. Saarbryukken, LAP LAMBERT, 2015. (In Russ.).
13. Yankovskaya V. V. Ponyatie i struktura professional'nogo potentsiala pedagogicheskikh kadrov vuzov [The Notion and Structure of Professional Potential of Pedagogic Personnel at Universities]. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy internet-zhurnal [Russian Economic Internet-Journal], 2017, No. 1, pp. 39. (In Russ.).
14. Jacobs J. The Economy of Cities. New York, Random House, 1969.
15. Krugman P. Development, Geography, and Economic Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, 1995.
Review
For citations:
Kukushkin S.N. Assessing the knowledge index of the region. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2019;(2):130-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2019-2-130-141