Country Positioning of Migration Flows in Ratings of Global Competitiveness
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2019-6-43-61
Abstract
The article shows results of marketing diagnosing of the migration flow development in 5 more or less developed countries of the world: Russia, the US, Canada, Mexico and Argentine. The authors studied and demonstrated the dependence of these countries on certain factors, which affect the level of population quality of life. Migration provides junction of mineral resources split by continents, countries and regions within countries and means of production with labour, it promotes meeting of population’s needs in jobs, housing, means of subsistence, social and professional mobility, changing social status and other characteristics of people life. By using statistic and comparative methods of research (correlative analysis, forecast, trend modeling) the authors managed to confirm or refute different hypotheses about labour migration development. They studied world ratings of countries by the level of expected life span, GDP per capita, weakness of states, unemployment, innovation development, competitiveness. By using the Russian Federation as an example the authors showed key challenges and advantages of migration flow. On the basis of the research recommendations dealing with improvement of migration climate in the Russian Federation were designed.
About the Authors
T. P. DankoRussian Federation
Tamara P. Danko – Doctor of Economics, Professor of the Department for Marketing, Chief Researcher of the Center of Statistics and Data Science
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997
A. S. Vyazovikova
Russian Federation
Anastasiya S. Vyazovikova – Senior Specialist of the Cluster Policy
22 Voznesensky pereulok, Moscow, 125009
References
1. Barikhin A. B. Bolshoy yuridicheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar [The Big Juridical Encyclopedic Dictionary], 2nd edition, revised and amended. Moscow, Books’ World, 2010. (In Russ.).
2. Vorobeva O. D. Mnogolikaya migratsiya [Diverse Migration]. Migratsiya i sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe razvitie [Migration and Social and Economic Development], 2016, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 9–16. (In Russ.).
3. Makhmudova M. M. K voprosu o regulirovanii trudovoy migratsii v ekonomike Rossii [Concerning Regulation of Labour Migration in Russian Economy]. Voprosy upravleniya [Issues of Management], 2016, No. 3 (40), pp. 74–80. (In Russ.).
4. Perevedentsev V. I. Metody izucheniya migratsii naseleniya [Methods of Studying Population Migration]. Moscow, Nauka, 1975. (In Russ.).
5. Rybakovskiy L. L. Migratsiya naseleniya: prognozy, faktory, politika [Population Migration (Theoretical Issues)]. Moscow, Nauka, 1987. (In Russ.).
6. Yudina T. N. O sotsiologicheskom analize migratsionnykh protsessov [About Sociological Analysis of Migration Processes]. (In Russ.). Available at: https://refdb.ru/look/2316789.html (accessed 11.09.2019).
7. Gryzunova N. V., Ekimova K. V., Zakharova D. S., Оrdov K. V., Kolmakov V. V., Danko T. P., Sekerin V. D. Monetary Policy and Economy: Transmission Channels and Business Competitiveness. Available at: http://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n19/18391934.html
8. Ravenstein E. G. The Laws of Migration. Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 1885, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 167–235.
Review
For citations:
Danko T.P., Vyazovikova A.S. Country Positioning of Migration Flows in Ratings of Global Competitiveness. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2019;(6):43-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2019-6-43-61