Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation: Theory, Practice, Methodology
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2019-6-124-148
Abstract
After adopting the federal law ‘About Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation’ strategic planning in the country was investigated. Methodological foundation of setting goals, fixing horizons of strategic planning was shaped by works of overseas and home experts in the field of institutional construction, system -genetics, structural analysis, quantitative modeling. The authors researched ideas about national development put forward by followers of liberal logics of step-by-step social engineering and representatives of historicism doctrine of theological planning of public development and showed possibilities of their combination. Disadvantages in public spheres of state activities dealing with forecasting, planning, programming and resource supply for the development, which are understood as elements of strategic planning were analyzed. The authors studied objective contradictions and risks in home practice of strategic planning and substantiated the necessity to upgrade institute of state programs in the Russian Federation. They rejected the dominance of once-only assignments and decisions in favour of documents of strategic planning. The method of finding optimum values for income distribution of the consolidated budget of the Russian Federation by levels of budget system was put forward. The three-level budget system of the country is considered as institute, instrument and resource source of strategic planning. The hypothesis about possibility to reach the optimum structure of budget system, which could create conditions for including sub-national bodies of power in implementation of national projects was substantiated.
About the Authors
O. V. MorozovRussian Federation
Oleg V. Morozov – PhD, Member of Council of Federation of Federal Assembly of Russian Federation, Head of Higher School of Public Policy
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997
M. A. Vasiliev
Russian Federation
Mikhail A. Vasiliev – Deputy Head of the Higher School of Public Policy
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997
A. G. Biryukov
Russian Federation
Aleksey G. Biryukov – PhD, Assistant to the Deputy
1 Okhotny Ryad, Moscow, 103265
References
1. Balatskiy E. V. Kognitivno-institutsionalnyy sintez D. Norta [D. North Cognitive-Institutional Synthesis]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost [Public Sciences and Our Time], 2011, No. 5, pp. 154–166. (In Russ.).
2. Bor N. Izbrannye nauchnye trudy [Selected academic works]. Vol. 2. Moscow, Nauka, 1971. (In Russ.).
3. Gayduk V. V., Lukyantsev A. S. Diskursivnaya osnova vyrabotki kursa strategicheskogo planirovaniya: sistemnoe videnie problemy [Discourse Basis of Designing the Course of Strategic Planning: System Vision of the Problem]. Etnosotsium i mezhnatsionalnaya kultura [Ethno-Socium and Inter-National Culture], 2018, No. 1, pp. 149–161. (In Russ.).
4. Gligich-Zolotareva M. V. Starye problemy i novye podkhody k strategicheskomu planirovaniyu v Rossii [Old Problems and New Approaches to Strategic Planning in Russia]. Federalizm [Federalism], 2014, No. 3, pp. 81–94. (In Russ.).
5. Ilin M. V. Gosudarstvennaya sostoyatelnost v politicheskoy nauke i politicheskoy praktike [State Solidness in Political Science and Political Practice]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science], 2011, No. 2, pp. 60–74. (In Russ.).
6. King A., Schneider B. Pervaya globalnaya revolyutsiya. Doklad Rimskogo kluba [The First Global Revolution. The Report of the Roman Club]. Moscow, Progress, 1991. (In Russ.).
7. Klyuchevskiy V. O. Kurs russkoy istorii [The Course of Russian History], in 9th v. Vol. 6. Moscow, Mysl, 1987. (Methodology of Russian History). (In Russ.).
8. Knyaginin V. N. Institut kak sposob prostranstvenno-vremennoy organizatsii [Institute as a Way of Spatial-Time Organization]. (In Russ.). Available at: http://www.shkp.ru/lib/archive/methodologies/2001/8
9. Lavrovskiy I. K. Demokratiya i rynok [Democracy and Market]. Moscow, 2010. (In Russ.).
10. Luman N. Vlast [Power], translated from German by A. Yu. Antonovskiy. Moscow, Praksis, 2001. (In Russ.).
11. Minakir P. A. Mify i realnosti prostranstvennykh ekonomicheskikh disproportsiy [Myths and Reality of Spatial Economic Disproportions]. Federalizm [Federalism], 2011, No. 1, pp. 43–56. (In Russ.).
12. Moiseev N. N. Universum. Informatsiya. Obshchestvo [Universum. Information. Society]. Moscow, Sustainable World, 2001. (In Russ.).
13. Morozov O. V. Byudzhetnyy protsess i mezhbyudzhetnye otnosheniya v sovremennoy Rossii [Budget Process and Inter-Budget Relations in Today’s Russia]. Federalizm [Federalism], 2019, No. 2 (94), pp. 87–105. (In Russ.).
14. Morozov O. V., Biryukov A. G., Vasilev M. A. Ob otdelnykh voprosakh pravovogo regulirovaniya tselepolaganiya, upravleniya i deyatelnosti Banka Rossii [Concerning Certain Issues of Legal Regulation in Goal-Setting and the Bank of Russia Work]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2019, No. 2 (104), pp. 67–80. (In Russ.).
15. Morozov O. V., Biryukov A. G., Vasilev M. A. Statistika mezhregionalnykh razlichiy i sostoyanie byudzhetnoy sistemy Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Statistics of Inter-Regional Differences and the Condition of the Budget System in the Russian Federation]. Statistika i ekonomika [Statistics and Economics], 2019, No. 4, pp. 73–89. (In Russ.).
16. North D. Ponimanie protsessa ekonomicheskikh izmeneniy [Understanding the Process of Economic Changes], translated from English by K. Martynov, N. Edelman. Moscow, Publishing house of the University – Higher School of Economics, 2010. (In Russ.).
17. Oyzerman T. I. Vozmozhno li predvidenie otdalennogo budushchego? [Is it Possible to Forecast the Far Future?]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Science], 2005, Vol. 75, No. 8, pp. 720–726. (In Russ.).
18. Pirozhkova S. V. Problema predskazaniy v sotsialnoy filosofii K. Poppera [The Problem of Forecast in K.Popper Social Philosophy]. Filosofskie issledovaniya [Philosophic Research], 2007, No. 3, pp. 79–97. (In Russ.).
19. Popper K. R. Otkrytoe obshchestvo i ego vragi [Open Society and Its Enemies]. Vol. 2. Vremya lzheprorokov: Gegel, Marks i drugie orakuly [The Time of Pseudo-Prophets: Hegel, Marx and other Oracles], translated from English, edited by V. N. Sadovskiy. Moscow, Phoenix, International Foundation ‘Cultural Initiative’, 1992. (In Russ.).
20. Popper K. R. Predpolozheniya i oproverzheniya: Rost nauchnogo znaniya [Suppositions and Refutations: Growth in Scientific Knowledge], translated from English. Moscow, Publishing house AST; ZAO NPL ‘Ermak’, 2004. (In Russ.).
21. Rastorguev V. N. Planirovanie i prognozirovanie: ideologicheskie ramki i tsivilizatsionnyy kontekst [Planning and Forecasting: Ideological Frames and Civilization Context]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of Philosophy], 2012, No. 2, pp. 3–13. (In Russ.).
22. Hayek F.A. fon. Doroga k rabstvu [The Road to Slavery], translated from English by M. B. Gnedovskiy; Introduction by N. Ya. Petrakova. Moscow, Economics, 1992. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Morozov O.V., Vasiliev M.A., Biryukov A.G. Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation: Theory, Practice, Methodology. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2019;(6):124-148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2019-6-124-148