APPLICATION OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT STANDARDS IN THE IT INDUSTRY: PRINCE2 AND PMBOK
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2020-1-56-66
Abstract
As competition associated with globalization grows, more and more organizations are adopting different approaches. This happens when organizations strive to become more efficient – “do more at lower costs” and quickly and cheaply launch new products on the market. In this regard, this paper is devoted to a comparative analysis of the two most popular project management standards PRINCE and PMBoK. The authors reviewed and analyzed the main features of these standards, conducted a critical review of their strengths and weaknesses and made recommendations on the use of a particular standard in a particular case. For example, if you need to get a detailed description of many extremely useful tools and methods that will help you better manage your project, you should use PMBoK. However, if it is necessary that the project management methodology helps to make project decisions, the relatively simple PRINCE2 process model clearly defines which project management decisions need to be made, by whom and when. The 26 management products in PRINCE2 are tightly integrated into the process model, providing guidance on what project management information is needed to support decision-making throughout the project.
About the Authors
R. R. VeynbergRussian Federation
Roman R. Veynberg - PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department for Informatics
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
N. A. Moiseev
Russian Federation
Nikita A. Moiseev - PhD, Associate Professor of the Department «System Analysis in Economics»
49 Leningradsky Avenue, Moscow, 125993, Russian Federation
S. M. Sakharova
Russian Federation
Sofja M. Sakharova - Specialist of Audit Department
Block C, 10 Presnenskaya Naberezhnaya, Moscow, 123317, Russian Federation
References
1. Klochkov A. K. KPI i motivatsiya personala. Polnyy sbornik prakticheskikh instrumentov [KPI and Staff Motivation. Complete Collection of Practical Tools]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2010. (In Russ.).
2. Bekker M. C. Project Governance – The Definition and Leadership Dilemma. Procedia –
3. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, No. 194, pp. 33–43.
4. Bredillet C. N., Turner J. R., Anbart F. T. Schools of Thought in Project Management. Research. Project Management Essential Reality for Business and Government, 2007, pp. 389–396.
5. Hlodversdottira K. H., Ingasonb H. T., Jonassonc H. I. The Status of Project Management within a City Hall of a European Capital. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, No. 74, pp. 305–315.
6. Morris P. W. G., Geraldi J. Managing the Institutional Context for Projects. Project Management Journal, 2011, No. 42 (6), pp. 20–32.
7. Obradovića V., Cicvarić K. S., Mitrovića Z. Rethinking Project Management – Did We Miss Marketing Management? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, No. 226, pp. 390–397.
8. Vartiaka L. Achieving Excellence in Projects. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, No. 26, pp. 292–299.
Review
For citations:
Veynberg R.R., Moiseev N.A., Sakharova S.M. APPLICATION OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT STANDARDS IN THE IT INDUSTRY: PRINCE2 AND PMBOK. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2020;1(1):56-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2020-1-56-66