Анализ и классификация способов оценки промышленно-симбиотических взаимодействий
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2020-5-26-41
Аннотация
Поиск решений, которые ограничивают потребление ресурсов и выбросы парниковых газов, имеет важное значение для обеспечения устойчивого экономического роста. Промышленный симбиоз оказался сильным союзником в достижении экологических, экономических и социальных целей, о чем свидетельствует растущее число публикаций на эту тему. В Европе и Азии, особенно в Китае, отмечалась более высокая распространенность промышленного симбиоза, что связано с реализацией государственной политики. В производственном секторе соглашения о промышленном симбиозе заключались чаще всего вследствие не только роста количества образующихся отходов, но и благодаря возможности интегрировать отходы и побочные продукты в производственный цикл. Наиболее широко это коснулось химической, цементной, бумажной и сталелитейной промышленности, а также нефтеперерабатывающих заводов. При повторном использовании отходов других отраслей промышленности не всегда возникает только положительный эффект для компаний. Отходы часто имеют более низкое качество, чем первичные материалы, которые они заменяют. В статье показано, как фирмы могут управлять качеством отходов путем интеграции поставщиков отходов в операционные процессы компании-покупателя. Автором обосновано, что управление качеством отходов представляет собой главную возможность промышленного симбиоза, особенно когда фирмы хотят повысить эффективность своей деятельности в этой области.
Об авторе
Е. Э. Уткина
Московский государственный университет имени М. В. Ломоносова
Россия
Россия
Екатерина Эрнестовна Уткина аспирантка кафедры экономики инноваций
119991, Москва, Ленинские горы, д. 1
Список литературы
1. Bozarth C. C., Warsing D. P., Flynn B. B., Flynn E. J. The Impact of Supply Chain Complexity on Manufacturing Plant Performance // Journal of Operations Management. 2009. – Vol. 27. – P. 78–93.
2. Cao X., Wen Z., Tian H., De Clercq D., Qu L. Transforming the Cement Industry into a Key Environmental Infrastructure for Urban Ecosystem: A Case Study of an Industrial City in China // Journal of Industrial Ecology. – 2018. – Vol. 22. – P. 881–893.
3. Chance E., Ashton W., Pereira J., Mulrow J., Norberto J., Derrible S., Guilbert S. The Plant An Experiment in Urban Food Sustainability // Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy. 2018. – Vol. 37. – P. 82–90.
4. Chertow M., Park J. Scholarship and Practice in Industrial Symbiosis: 1989–2014 // Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology. – 2016. – Ch. 5. – P. 87–116.
5. Chopra S. S., Khanna V. Understanding Resilience in Industrial Symbiosis Networks: Insights from Network Analysis // Journal of Environmental Management. – 2014. – Vol. 141. – P. 86–94.
6. Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive Capacity: a New Perspective on Learning and Innovation // Administrative Science Quarterly. – 1990. – Vol. 35 (1). – P. 128–152.
7. Daddi T., Nucci B., Iraldo F. Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to Measure the Environmental Benefits of Industrial Symbiosis in an Industrial Cluster of SMEs // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2017. – Vol. 147. – P. 157–164.
8. Domenech T., Bleischwitz R., Doranova A., Panayotopoulos D., Roman L. Mapping Industrial Symbiosis Development in Europe – Typologies of Networks, Characteristics, Performance and Contribution to the Circular Economy // Resources, Conservation & Recycling. – 2019. Vol. 141. – P. 76–98.
9. Dong L., Zhang H., Fujita T., Ohnishi S., Li H., Fujii M., Dong H. Environmental and Economic Gains of Industrial Symbiosis for Chinese Iron/Steel Industry: Kawasaki’s 68 Experience and Practice in Liuzhou and Jinan // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2013. Vol. 59. – P. 226–238.
10. Evans S., Beneditti M., Holdago M. Library of Industrial Symbiosis Case Studies and Linked Exchanges (Dataset). – URL: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.126082017
11. Fang K., Dong L., Ren J., Zhang Q., Han L., Fu H. Carbon Footprints of Urban Transition: Tracking Circular Economy Promotions in Guiyang, China // Ecological Modelling. – 2013. Vol. 365. – P. 30–44.
12. Ferreira J., Fernandes C., Ratten V. The Effects of Technology Transfers and Institutional Factors on Economic Growth: Evidence from Europe and Oceania // The Journal of Technology Transfer. – 2019. – Vol. 44. – P. 1505–1528.
13. Feyissa T. T., Sharma R. R. K., Lay K. K. The Impact of the Core Company's Strategy on the Dimensions of Supply Chain Integration // The International Journal of Logistics Management. – 2019. – Vol. 30 (3). – P. 231–260.
14. Gille Z. Legacy of Waste or Wasted Legacy? The End of Industrial Ecology in PostSocialist Hungary // Ebvironmental Politics. – 2000. – Vol. 9 (1). – P. 203–231.
15. Guo B., Geng Y., Sterr T., Dong L., Liu Y. Evaluation of Promoting Industrial Symbiosis in a Chemical Industrial Park: A Case of Midong // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2016. Vol. 135. – P. 995–1008.
16. Hashimoto S., Fujita T., Geng Y., Nagasawa E. Realizing CO 2 Emission Reduction through Industrial Symbiosis: A Cement Production Case Study for Kawasaki // Resources, Conservation & Recycling. – 2010. – Vol. 54. – P. 704–710.
17. Huo B., Ye Y., Zhao X., Zhu K. Supply Chain Integration: a Taxonomy Perspective // International Journal of Production Economics. – 2019. – Vol. 207. – P. 236–246.
18. Hutchins M. J., Richter J. S., Henry M. L., Sutherland J. W. Development of Indicators for the Social Dimension of Sustainability in a U. S. Business Context // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2019. – Vol. 212. – P. 687–697.
19. Ibáñez-Forés V., Bovea M. D., Coutinho-Nóbrega C., de Medeiros H. R. Assessing the Social Performance of Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems in Developing Countries: Proposal of Indicators and a Case Study // Ecological Indicators. – 2019. – Vol. 98. – P. 164–178.
20. Jacobsen N. B. Industrial Symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A Quantitative Assessment of Economic and Environmental Aspects // Journal of Industrial Ecology. – 2006. – Vol. 10. – P. 239–255.
21. Kim H. W., Dong L., Choi A. E. S., Fujii M., Fujita T., Park H.-.S. Co-Benefit Potential of Industrial and Urban Symbiosis Using Waste Heat from Industrial Park in Ulsan, Korea // Resources, Conservation & Recycling. – 2018. – Vol. 135. – P. 225–234.
22. Kühnen M., Hahn R. Systemic Social Performance Measurement: Systematic Literature Review and Explanations on the Academic Status Quo from a Product Life-Cycle Perspective // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2018. – Vol. 205. – P. 690–705.
23. Li B., Xiang P., Hu M., Zhang C., Dong L. The Vulnerability of Industrial Symbiosis: a Case Study of Qijiang Industrial Park, China // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2017. – Vol. 157. – P. 267–277.
24. Liu X., Bae J. The Vulnerability of Industrial Symbiosis: a Case Study of Qijiang Industrial Park // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2017. – Vol. 157. – P. 267–277.
25. Lombardi D. R., Laybourn P. Redefining Industrial Symbiosis // Journal of Industrial Ecology. – 2012. – Vol. 16. – P. 28–37.
26. Martin M., Harris S. Prospecting the Sustainability Implications of an Emerging Industrial Symbiosis Network // Resources, Conservation & Recycling. – 2018. – Vol. 138. – P. 246–256.
27. Pao H.-T., Chen C.-C. Decoupling Strategies: CO 2 Emissions, Energy Resources, and Economic Growth in the Group of Twenty // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2019. – Vol. 206. – P. 907–919.
28. Park H., Chung C. C. The Role of Subsidiary Learning Behavior and Absorptive Capacity in Foreign Subsidiary Expansion // International Business Review. – 2019. – Vol. 28 (4). – P. 685–695.
29. Petit G., Sablayrolles C., Bris G. Y.-L. Combining Eco-Social and Environmental Indicators to Assess the Sustainability Performance of a Food Value Chain: a Case Study // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2018. – Vol. 191. – P. 135–143.
30. Pires A., Martinho G., Rodrigues S., Gomes M. I. Sustainable Solid Waste Collection and Management. – Springer, 2019.
31. Prosman E. J. Supply Chain Capabilities for Industrial Symbiosis in the Process Industry. Lessons from the Cement Industry. – Aalborg : Aalborg University Press, 2018.
32. Prosman E. J., Scholten K., Power D. M. Dealing with Defaulting Suppliers Using Behavioral Based Governance Methods: an Ageny Theory Perspective // Supply Chain Management International Journal. – 2016. – Vol. 21. – P. 499–511.
33. Qu S. J., Zhou Y. Y., Zhang Y. L., Wahab M. I. M., Zhang G., Ye Y. Y. Optimal Strategy for a Green Supply Chain Considering Shipping Policy and Default Risk // Computers & Industrial Engineering. – 2019. – Vol. 131. – P. 172–186.
34. Schoubroeck S., Dael M., Passel S., Malina R. A Review of Sustainability Indicators for Biobased Chemicals // Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. – 2018. – Vol. 94. – P. 115–126.
35. Setia P., Patel P. C. How Information Systems Help Create OM Capabilities: Consequents and Antecedents of Operational Absorptive Capacity // Journal of Operations Management. 2013. – Vol. 31. – P. 409–431.
36. Shi L., Chertow M. Organizational Boundary Change in Industrial Symbiosis: Revisiting the Guitang Group in China // Sustainability. – 2017. – Vol. 9. – P. 1085.
37. Song X., Geng Y., Dong H., Chen W. Social Network Analysis on Industrial Symbiosis: a Case of Gujiao Eco-Industrial Park // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2018. – Vol. 193. – P. 414–423.
38. Velenturf A. P. M. Promoting Industrial Symbiosis: Empirical Observations of Low-Carbon Innovations in the Humber Region, UK // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2016. Vol. 128. – P. 116–130.
39. Wang Q., Tang H., Yuan X., Zuo J., Zhang J., Gao Z., Hong J. Investigating Vulnerability of Ecological Industrial Symbiosis Network Based on Automatic Control Theory // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. – 2018. – Vol. 25. – P. 27321–27333.
40. Wu J., Pu G., Guo Y., Lv J., Shang J. Retrospective and Prospective Assessment of Exergy, Life Cycle Carbon Emissions, and Water Footprint for Coking Network Evolution in China // Applied Energy. – 2018. – Vol. 218. – P. 479–493.
41. Wu J., Qi H., Wang R. Insight into Industrial Symbiosis and Carbon Metabolism from the Evolution of Iron and Steel Industrial Network // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2016. Vol. 135. – P. 251–262.
42. Yazan D. M., Fraccascia L., Mes M., Zijm H. Cooperation in Manure-Based Biogas Production Networks: an Agent-Based Modeling Approach // Applied Energy. – 2018. Vol. 212. – P. 820–833.
43. Yenipazarli A. Incentives for Environmental Research and Development: Consumer Preferences, Competitive Pressure and Emissions Taxation // European Journal of Operational Research. – 2019. – Vol. 276. – P. 757–769.
44. Yu F., Han F., Cui Z. Evolution of Industrial Symbiosis in an Eco-Industrial Park in China // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2015. – Vol. 87. – P. 339–347.
45. Zahra S. A., George G. Absorptive Capacity: a Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension // Academy of Management Review. – 2002. – Vol. 27 (2). – P. 185–203.
46. Zhang X., Chai L. Structural Features and Evolutionary Mechanisms of Industrial Symbiosis Networks: Comparable Analyses of Two Different Cases // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2019. – Vol. 213. – P. 528–539.
47. Zhao X., Huo B., Selen W., Yeung J. H. Y. The Impact of Internal Integration and Relationship Commitment on External Integration // Journal of Operations Management. 2011. – Vol. 29. – P. 17–32.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Уткина Е.Э. Анализ и классификация способов оценки промышленно-симбиотических взаимодействий. Вестник Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. Плеханова. 2020;17(5):26-41. https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2020-5-26-41
For citation:
Utkina E.E. Analyzing and Classifying Ways of Assessing Industrial-Symbiotic Interactions. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2020;17(5):26-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2020-5-26-41
Просмотров:
505
Послать статью по эл. почте 