Problems of Managing Processes of Intellectual Property Commercialization in Times of Economic Relation Virtualization

The research studies certain aspects of using intellectual property and its commercialization. In the last 30 years the development of advanced production technologies changed the system of economic relations between entities drastically. The key role in this transformation is attributed to digital technologies. Therefore, the major part of finance operations and getting information take part in virtual space and it impacts all exchange technologies. The replacement of paper money by digital analogues on bank accounts decreased the interaction of money cost and material production. These transformations influenced processes of innovation and know-how commercialization. The legal side of commercialization problem requires more accurate definitions of intellectual property as a new type of possible right holder emerged, i. e. artificial intellect and intellect property itself becomes more and more intangible. Apart from that, issues and problems of providing security for man and society through intellectual property commercialization acquire new quality and demonstrate new threats. For instance, the development of block-chain technology created a challenge to the present day banking system and sovereignty of states and the development of cyber-sports exerts uncontrolled impact on gamers’ consciousness, whose number reaches thousands of millions. Therefore, it is difficult to overestimate the importance of understanding all internal processes and after-effects of intellectual property commercialization, which makes this academic problem continuously topical. The author proposes to focus on mankind security and protection against global threats of new types of intellectual property commercialization.

1. Additivnye tekhnologii – chto eto takoe i gde primenyayutsya [Additive Technologies, What Is it and Where Can it be Used]. (In Russ.). Available at: https://old.sk.ru/news/b/press/archive/2019/09/18/additivnye-tehnologii-_1320_-chto-etotakoe-i-gde-primenyayutsya.aspx

2. Bezuglaya N. S. Potentsial neustoychivogo ravnovesiya v ekonomicheskikh sistemakh i obespechenie ikh ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti [Potential of Unstable Balance in Economic Systems and Provision of their Economic Security]. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo [Economics and Entrepreneurship], 2014, No. 11-3 (52), pp. 734–738. (In Russ.).

3. Bezuglaya N. S. Problemy prognozirovaniya ekonomicheskikh sistem i podkhody k ikh resheniyu [Problems of Economic System Forecasting and Approaches to their Resolving]. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo [Economics and Entrepreneurship], 2017, No. 10-2 (87), pp. 952– 956. (In Russ.).

4. Bezuglaya N. S., Oganesyan T. L., Fomenko E. V. Sovremennye tendentsii formirovaniya virtualnykh organizatsiy i ugrozy natsionalnoy bezopasnosti [Current Trends of Shaping Virtual Organizations and Threats to National Security]. Vestnik Akademii znaniy [Bulletin of Knowledge Academy], 2018, No. 6 (29), pp. 64–69. (In Russ.).

5. Labzin M. V. Nauchnye kontseptsii ponimaniya prava IS [Academic Conceptions of Understanding of Intellectual Property Right]. (In Russ.). Available at: https:// www.intellectpro.ru/press/works/nauchnye_kontseptsii_ponimaniya_prava_is/

6. Razvadovskaya Yu. V., Marchenko A. A. Modernizatsiya rossiyskoy ekonomiki: transformatsiya otnosheniy sobstvennosti, institutsionalnye izmeneniya i intellektualnaya sobstvennost [Modernization of Russian Economy: Transformation of Property Relations, Institutional Changes and Intellectual Property]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika [Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. Economics], 2018, No. 43, pp. 43–64. (In Russ.).

7. Chernukha A. V. Rol intellektualnoy sobstvennosti v kontseptsii natsionalnoy bezopasnosti [The Role of Intellectual Property in the Concept of National Security]. Pravo i bezopasnost [Law and Security], 2008, No. 2 (27). (In Russ.). Available at: https://dpr.ru/ pravo/pravo_23_4.htm

8. Shredinger E. Chto takoe zhizn? Fizicheskiy aspekt zhivoy kletki [What is Life? The Physical Aspect of Live Cell]. Moscow – Izhevsk, NIC ‘Regular and Chaos Dynamics’, 2002. (In Russ.).

9. Agitha T. G. Impact of IP on Public Health: The Developed Country Scenario. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, Vol. 18, July, pp. 382–389.

10. Bezuglaya N. S., Shamray I. N. National Security and Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: Challenges to the Economic System of the State and Prospects for Ensuring its Security. Regionology, 2020, Vol. 28 (3), pp. 449–469.

11. Chou R. Startups and investors and trolls, oh my!: How commercialization patents can benefit startup innovation. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property. Available at: https://jtip.law.northwestern.edu/issues/startups-and-investors-and-trolls-oh-my-howcommercialization-patents-can-benefit-startup-innovation/

12. Cook T. European Intellectual Property Developments. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2011, Vol. 16, September, pp. 426–428.

13. Intellectual Property and Indigenous People: A Major Challenge. Available at: https:// www.wipo.int/pressroom/ru/stories/tk_seminar2015.html

14. Matveev A. G. Copyright Regulation in Russia: Rejection of Classical Theories or Legislative Mistakes? Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, Vol. 18, July, pp. 360–368.

15. Myers G. Toward a Unified Theory of Intellectual Property Misuse. Available at: https:// ssrn.com/abstract=1507173

16. Ravinder J., Rod M. Intellectual Property Management: Assessing Stakeholder Knowledge Regarding Obtaining Valid Patent Rights. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, Vol. 18, May, pp. 251–258.

17. Ravindran S. R. Capacity Building for Innovation: Role of IP Infrastructure. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2004, Vol. 9, September, pp. 462–470.