Providing Economic Security of Enterprises Through Sindinic as Science of Danger
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2024-1-148-159
Abstract
Against a background of opportunities opened to business in times of innovation economy we can observe growing risks connected with specific features of information flows, technologies of transaction handling and new approaches in management. Due to these factors the author studies a model depicting parameters and characteristics of processes providing economic security of enterprises and possibilities of its application in practice. The article substantiates the assumption about expediency of using sindinic principles in managing the enterprise with regard to the current requirements to the level of economic security. The author puts forward the approach to using 5D model of sindinic in management of industrial enterprises, as well as innovation systems as a solution aimed at developing and retaining its competitive features in active interaction with external environment.
About the Author
A. A. Dokukina
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna A. Dokukina, PhD, Assistant Professor
Department for Industrial Economics
109992
36 Stremyanny Lane
Moscow
References
1. Bukhvalov A. V., Katkalo V. S. Ot istokov issledovaniy menedzhmenta k budushchim paradigmam: analiz innovatsionnykh kompaniy [From Roots of Management Studying to Future Paradigms: Analyzing Innovation Companies]. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta [Russian Journal of Management], 2021, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 49–60. (In Russ.).
2. Bystrov A. V., Pimenov V. V. Strategiya ekonomicheskoy i informatsionnoy bezopasnosti OPK – vazhneyshie komponenty natsionalnoy bezopasnosti Rossii [Strategy of Economic and Information Security of the Defense Complex as Essential Elements of National Security of Russia]. Sbornik materialov kruglogo stola «Sovremennyy miroporyadok i ego vliyanie na natsionalnuyu bezopasnost RF» [Collection of materials of the round table discussion ‘Current Global Order and its Impact on National Security of Russia’]. Moscow, VAGSH VS RF, 2020. (In Russ.).
3. Vasileva L. P. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost: opredeleniya i sushchnost [Economic Security: Definitions and Essence]. Zhurnal prikladnykh issledovaniy [Journal of Applied Research], 2020, No. 3, pp. 6–13. (In Russ.).
4. Gorbunov V. L., Matveev P. G. Metodika otsenki innovatsionnogo potentsiala predpriyatiya [Methodology of Enterprise Innovation Potential Appraisal]. Innovatsii [Innovation], 2002, No. 8, pp. 67–69.
5. Endovitskaya A. V., Volkova T. A. Finansovaya ustoychivost kak faktor ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti predpriyatiya [Financial Sustainability as a Factor of Economic Security of Enterprises]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta inzhenernykh tekhnologiy [Bulletin of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies], 2015, No. 3 (65), pp. 258–262. (In Russ.).
6. Zinchenko V. I., Gubin E. P., Monastyrnyy E. A., Pushkarenko A. B., Tyulkov G. I. Printsipy razrabotki i primeneniya metodiki kompleksnoy otsenki innovatsionnogo potentsiala promyshlennogo predpriyatiya [Principles of Developing and Using Methods of Complex Assessment of Innovation Potential of Industrial Enterprise]. Innovatsii [Innovation], 2005, No. 5, pp. 58–63. (In Russ.).
7. Innovatsionnyy potentsial: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya : monografiya [Innovation Potential: Current Situation and Prospects of development : monograph]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 2019. (In Russ.).
8. Kazantseva S. Yu., Kazantsev D. A. Tendentsii razvitiya normativnogo pravovogo regulirovaniya iskusstvennogo intellekta, robotov i obektov robototekhniki v Rossiyskoy Federatsii v sfere finansovogo kontrolya [Trends in Developing Legal Regulation of Artificial Intellect, Robots and Robot-Equipment in the Russian Federation in the Field of Finance Control]. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo [Economics and Entrepreneurship], 2021, No. 6 (131), pp. 1279–1282. (In Russ.).
9. Kalenov O. E. Tsifrovye vozmozhnosti i ugrozy organizatsii v usloviyakh novoy ekonomiki [Digital Opportunities and Threats of Organization in Conditions of New Economy]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2021, Vol. 18, No. 3 (117), pp. 66–75. (In Russ.).
10. Kleyner G. B. Upravlenie sovremennym predpriyatiem na osnove intellektualnoy teorii firmy [Managing Today’s Enterprise on the Basis of Intellectual Theory of Firm]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [Economic Restoration of Russia], 2022, No. 1 (71), pp. 31–38. (In Russ.).
11. Kleyner G. B. Ekonomika ekosistem: shag v budushchee [Ecosystem Economics: Step to the Future]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [Economic Restoration of Russia], 2019, No. 1 (59), pp. 40–45. (In Russ.).
12. Krivulya P. V. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost subektov khozyaystvennoy deyatelnosti – predmet nauki sindiniki organizatsiy i proizvodnoy deyatelnosti po predotvrashcheniyu ushcherba [Economic Security of Business Activity Entities – as a Subject of Science Sindinic of Organizations and Production Work Aimed at Damage Preventing]. Vestnik Luganskogo natsionalnogo universiteta imeni Vladimira Dalya [Bulletin of the Lugansk V. Dal’ National University], 2013, No. 10 (199), part 1, pp. 99–109. (In Russ.).
13. Morkhat P. M. Riski i ugrozy, svyazannye s primeneniem iskusstvennogo intellekta [Risks and Threats Connected with Artificial Intellect Use]. Agrarnoe i zemelnoe pravo [Agrarian and Land Law], 2017, No. 12 (156), pp. 60–65. (In Russ.).
14. Petrovskaya I. A. Kontseptsii liderstva v pozitivnoy paradigme organizatsionnogo povedeniya [Concepts of Leadership in Positive Paradigm of Organizational Behavior]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya [Problems of Theory and Practice in Management], 2018, No. 8, pp. 85–90. (In Russ.).
15. Petukhov M. V. Ekosistemnyy podkhod kak put opredeleniya napravleniy formirovaniya konkurentnykh preimushchestv v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii [Ecosystem Approach as a Way to Find Lines in Shaping Competitive Advantages in Conditions of Digitalization]. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Economics: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow], 2022, Vol. 12, No. 5A, pp. 459–469. (In Russ.).
16. Pimenov V. V., Shafranskiy P. K. Ekonomicheskaya i informatsionnaya bezopasnost v usloviyakh tsifrovoy transformatsii: instrumenty i mekhanizmy po ikh neytralizatsii [Economic and Information Security in Conditions of Digital Transformation: Tools and Mechanism of their Elimination]. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost i kachestvo [Economic Security and Quality], 2018, No. 1 (30), pp. 25–30. (In Russ.).
17. Statsenko V. V., Bychkova I. I. Ekosistemnyy podkhod v postroennii sovremennykh biznes-modeley [Ecosystem Approach in Building Advanced Business-Models]. Industrialnaya ekonomika [Industrial Economics], 2021, No. 1, pp. 45–61. (In Russ.).
18. Tikhonov A. I. Obespechenie ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti predpriyatiya za schet otsenki kadrovykh riskov [Providing Economic Security of Enterprise at the Expense of HR Risk Estimation]. Vestnik akademii znaniy [Bulletin of Knowledge Academy], 2020, No. 1 (36), pp. 238–245. (In Russ.).
19. Chechin O. P. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya v kontseptsii ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti [Digital Transformation in Concept of Economic Security]. Ekonomicheskie nauki [Economic Sciences], 2019, No. 176, pp. 92–97. (In Russ.).
20. Hartson H. R., Siochi A. C., Hix D. The UAN: A User-Oriented Representation for Direct Manipulation Interface Designs. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 1990, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 181–203.
Review
For citations:
Dokukina A.A. Providing Economic Security of Enterprises Through Sindinic as Science of Danger. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2024;(1):148-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2024-1-148-159
Views:
398
Email this article 