Technological Development of Industry Based on Integration of Science, Business and State
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2024-2-55-64
Abstract
The article studies principle reasons for technological underdevelopment of Russia compared with western countries and identifies regulatory documents aimed at finding promising ways to resolve this problem. Analysis of the numerous academic works investigating issues of innovation development of industry, importance of scientific and technical progress for economic growth, cooperation between universities and industrial enterprises provides an opportunity to substantiate topicality of the research. The author on the basis of different interpretations of the notion ‘technological development’ could formulate his own definition. Further on, a conclusion was drawn that universities, industrial enterprises and state are actors of technological development. The author built a model and mechanisms of organizational and technical interaction of representatives of science, business and state. The project ‘Advanced Engineering Schools’ is an example of such interaction aimed at providing industry with highly-qualified engineers. Research findings are tested through the mechanism of scientific and industrial integration of the company ODK, the St. Petersburg Polytechnic University and state. The author’s developments have practical significance, as they can be used in education, at industrial enterprises and in other sectors of economy for planning programs of technological modernization in industry.
About the Author
O. O. Kochetova
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga O. Kochetova, Assistant of the Department for Industrial Economics
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 109992
References
1. Glazev S. Yu. Teoriya dolgosrochnogo tekhniko-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Theory of Long-Term Technical and Economic Development]. Moscow, VlaDar, 1993. (In Russ.).
2. Deryabin Yu. A. Tekhnologicheskoe partnerstvo promyshlennykh predpriyatiy s obrazovatelnymi organizatsiyami vysshego obrazovaniya [Technological Partnership of Industrial Enterprises with Educational Institutions of Higher Education]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika» [Bulletin of Omsk University. The Series "Economics"], 2020, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 67–74. (In Russ.).
3. Idrisov G. I. Promyshlennaya politika Rossii v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Industrial Policy of Russia in Modern Conditions]. Moscow, E. T. Gaidar Institute of Economic Policy Foundation, 2016. (In Russ.).
4. Karastelev B. Ya. Metodicheskie aspekty issledovaniya urovnya tekhnologichnosti proizvodstvennykh sistem [Methodological Aspects of the Study of the Level of Manufacturability of Production Systems]. Izvestiya Dalnevostochnogo federalnogo universiteta. Ekonomika i upravlenie [The News of the Far Eastern Federal University. Economics and Management], 2014, No. 4 (72), pp. 107–114. (In Russ.).
5. Klark B. R. Sozdanie predprinimatelskikh universitetov. Organizatsionnye napravleniya transformatsii [Creation of Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Directions of Transformation], translated from English. Moscow, Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2020. (In Russ.).
6. Korkeshko O. N. Osnovy strategii tekhnologicheskoy modernizatsii predpriyatiya [Fundamentals of the Strategy of Technological Modernization of the Enterprise]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Orenburg State University], 2011, No. 13, pp. 245–249. (In Russ.).
7. Malinovskaya Yu. A. Funktsionalnoe modelirovanie tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya promyshlennogo predpriyatiya vo vzaimodeystvii s vuzom [Functional Modeling of Technological Development of an Industrial Enterprise in Cooperation with a University]. Vestnik NGUEU, 2014, No. 2, pp. 320–330. (In Russ.).
8. Romanova O. A. Mnogovektornaya promyshlennaya politika Rossii v usloviyakh formirovaniya novogo industrialnogo landshafta [Russia's Multi-Vector Industrial Policy in the Context of the Formation of a New Industrial Landscape]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Journal of Economic Theory], 2020, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 276–291. (In Russ.).
9. Ryzhaya A. A. Faktory, vliyayushchie na nauchno-tekhnologicheskoe razvitie promyshlennogo kompleksa regiona [Factors Influencing the Scientific and Technological Development of the Industrial Complex of the Region]. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatelskiy zhurnal [International Scientific-Research Journal], 2017, No. 5 (59), pp. 38–43. (In Russ.).
10. Strelkova L. V. Tekhnologicheskoe razvitie otrasley promyshlennosti: otsenka i perspektivy [Technological Development of Industries: Assessment and Prospects]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo [Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University Named after N. I. Lobachevsky], 2012, No. 2-2, pp. 247–251. (In Russ.).
11. Sukharev O. S. Ekonomicheskaya politika i razvitie promyshlennosti [Economic Policy and Industrial Development]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika, 2011. (In Russ.).
12. Tatarkin A. I. Promyshlennaya politika kak osnova sistemnoy modernizatsii ekonomiki Rossii [Industrial Policy as the Basis for the Systemic Modernization of the Russian Economy]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University], 2008, No. 19, pp. 5–17. (In Russ.).
13. Tolstykh T. O. Kooperatsiya vuzov i promyshlennykh predpriyatiy dlya dostizheniya tekhnologicheskogo suvereniteta strany [Cooperation of Universities and Industrial Enterprises to Achieve Technological Sovereignty of the Country]. Region: sistemy, ekonomika, upravlenie [Region: Systems, Economics, Management], 2023, No. 4 (63), pp. 77–84. (In Russ.).
14. Freeman С. Changement Technologique et Economie Mondiale. Futuribles, 1994, No. 186, pp. 25–50.
15. Mensch G. Stalemate in Technology: Innovations Overcome the Depression. New York, Ballinger Publishing Company, 1979.
16. Nelson R. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York, Oxford, 1993.
Review
For citations:
Kochetova O.O. Technological Development of Industry Based on Integration of Science, Business and State. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2024;(2):55-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2024-2-55-64
Views:
286
Email this article 