ESG Integration in the Light of Regression Analysis
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2025-1-25-34
Abstract
Ecological, social and corporate governance (ESG) becomes an important element in strategy of companies aiming at sustainable development. However, the process of ESG initiatives face serious challenges, including the absence of uniform accounting standards, expensive ESG strategy realization and shortage of reliable information. The goal of the present article is to study these problems and their impact on corporate governance. Using data of international consulting companies, such as McKinsey, MSCI, Sustainalytics, Bloomberg the authors analyzed problems dealing with ESG strategy realization and arising risks. The key component of the research is a mathematic model of multiple linear regression, which evaluates the quantitative impact of ESG factors on market company capitalization. The results of the analysis are demonstrated, they show the impact of ESG factors on company capitalization and it can explain the vector of their advance into corporate strategies. Provided conclusions have practical importance for business, researchers and regulating bodies wishing to improve integration of ESG practices in conditions of global economic turbulence. The novelty of the research includes the use of regression coefficient to evaluate ESG factors of market capitalization. These findings underline the necessity of well-balanced investment, data transparency and standard unification for successful ESG integration into corporate governance.
About the Authors
P. I. SevostyanovRussian Federation
Pavel I. Sevostyanov - PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department for Political Analysis and Socio-Psychological Processes of the PRUE; Full State Councilor of the Russian Federation. Address: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics.
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 109992
Z. V. Bogaturiya
Russian Federation
Zarina V. Bogaturiya - Lecturer at the Business School of Marketing and Entrepreneurship of the PRUE.
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 109992
References
1. Bogle J. C. Common Sense on Mutual Funds: Fully Updated 10th Anniversary Edition. NJ, John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
2. Dimson E., Marsh P., Staunton M. Global Investment Returns Yearbook 2022 Summary Edition. Credit Suisse Research Institute, 2022. Available at: https://www.readkong.com/page/credit-suisse-global-investment-returns-yearbook-2023-3767679
3. Eccles R. G., Crowley D. F. C. Turning Down the Heat on the ESG Debate: Separating Material Risk Disclosures from Salient Political Issues. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, 2023. Available at: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu (accessed 29.11.2024).
4. Elkington J. Triple Bottom Line: Rethinking the Foundations of Sustainability. Journal of Corporate Sustainability, 2021, Vol. 14 (2), pp. 10–20.
5. Friedman M. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, 2007, Vol. 32, pp. 173–178.
6. Garrett D. G., Ivanov I. T. Gas, Guns, and Governments: Financial Costs of Anti-ESG Policies. Brookings, 2023, April 12. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/gas-guns-and-governments/ (accessed 24.11.2024).
7. Segal M. DeSantis Signs Anti-ESG Rules into Law. ESG Today, 2023, May 3. Available at: https://www.esgtoday.com/desantis-signs-anti-esg-rules-into-law/ (accessed 22.11.2024).
Review
For citations:
Sevostyanov P.I., Bogaturiya Z.V. ESG Integration in the Light of Regression Analysis. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2025;(1):25-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2025-1-25-34