ESTIMATING RETURN OF HUMAN CAPITAL IN THE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2015-2-24-33
Abstract
Human capital is an important resource of any university. Efficiency and quality of educational institutions' work depend directly on quantitative and qualitative indicators of intellectual and human capital of workers. Today the focus in organizing business processes is shifting from managing labour resources of the organization to managing costs and risks of the human capital. Thus investment in the development of university personnel should be considered as investment playing an important role in the process of increasing human capital of society. The article investigates factors of shaping human capital, the model of the human capital return, estimates efficiency of managerial decisions based on the metric approach and provides findings of the research of human capital of the Russian Plekhanov University of Economics faculty.
About the Authors
Natalia F. Chelukhina
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department for Insurance and Risk Management of the PRUE
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
Liliya D. Baklanova
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department for Insurance and Risk Management of the PRUE
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
References
1. Galanov V. A. Vuz, prepodavatel' i rynok [University, Lecturer and Market], Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2013, No. 5 (59), pp. 5–11. (In Russ.).
2. Krakovskaya I. N. Investitsii v chelovecheskiy kapital innovatsionnogo vuza: sistemnyy podkhod k upravleniyu [Investments in Human Capital of the Innovative University: System Approach], Creative Economics, 2011, No. 2 (50), pp. 52–60. (In Russ.).
3. Rampersad Kh. K., Vetluzhskikh E. Sinergeticheskiy effekt ot sbalansirovannosti lichnykh i korporativnykh tseley [Synergy Effect of Balancing Private and Corporate Goals], Motivation and Remuneration, 2007, No. 2, pp. 82–88. (In Russ.).
4. Fitts-Ents Ya. Rentabel'nost' investitsiy v personal [Profitability of Investments in Personnel]. Moscow, Vershina, 2006. (In Russ.).
5. Chelukhina N. F. Chelovecheskie resursy kak riskovyy aktiv organizatsii [Human Capital as a Risk Asset of the Organization], Uchenye zapiski Rossiyskoy akademii predprinimatel'stva: rol' i mesto tsivilizovannogo predprinimatel'stva v ekonomike Rossii [Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Entrepreneurship: Role and Place of Civilized Entrepreneurship in Russian Economy], 2014, Issue 41, pp. 528–536. (In Russ.). 6. Abeysekera I., Guthrie J. Human Capital Reporting in a Developing Nation, The British Accounting Review, 2004, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 251–268. 7. Bontis N. Assessing Knowledge Assets: a Review of the Models Used to Measure Intellectual Capital, International Journal of Management Reviews, 2001, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 41–60. 8. Cole S. Age and Scientific Performance, American Journal of Sociology, 1979, pp. 958–977. 9. Diamond A. M. The Life-Cycle Research Productivity of Mathematicians and Scientists, Journal of Gerontology, 1986, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 520–525. 10. Fox M. F. Publication Productivity Among Scientists: A Critical Reviewm, Social Studies of Science, 1983, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 285–305.
6. Joy S. What Should I be Doing, and Where are They Doing it? Scholarly Productivity of Academic Psychologists, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2006, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 346–364. 12. Stroebe W. The Graying of Academia: Will it Reduce Scientific Productivity? American Psychologist, 2010, Vol. 65, No. 7, p. 660.
Review
For citations:
Chelukhina N.F., Baklanova L.D. ESTIMATING RETURN OF HUMAN CAPITAL IN THE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2015;(2):24-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2015-2-24-33
Views:
484
Email this article 