FORMS OF BUSINESS INTEGRATION: VIEW FROM THE POSITIONS OF INSTITUTIONAL THEORY
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2015-2-34-45
Abstract
The article analyzes the most popular forms of doing business, such as unitary, divisional, adhocratic, module and network and discusses their advantages and disadvantages. It is grounded that present day Russian practice of integrating science-intensive companies does not take into account either new forms of integration being developed in the world now or positive soviet experience. The author identifies the key drawbacks of organizational structure of big Russian integrated bodies. Scientific novelty of the article implies the use of institutional methodology for the analysis of the practice for creating and managing large institutional complexes. For example, it could be researching possibilities of using different regulatory systems (methods of coordination) of these structures participants.
About the Author
Elena V. Ustyuzhanina
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economics, Professor, the Head of the Department for Economic Theory of the PRUE
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
References
1. Veber M. Istoriya khozyaystv [History of Economies], Selected works. Moscow, Progress, 1990. (In Russ.).
2. Daft R. Teoriya organizatsii [Theory of Organization]. Moscow, UNITI, 2009. (In Russ.).
3. Dementiev V. E. Rol' firm raznykh razmerov na otdel'nykh fazakh dlinnoy volny [The Role of Firms of Different Sizes at Certain Phases of Long Wave], Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody [Economics and Mathematic Methods], 2012, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 33–46. (In Russ.).
4. Mintsberg G. Struktura v kulake: sozdanie effektivnoy organizatsii [Structure in a Fist: Developing an Efficient Organization]. Saint Petersburg, Piter, 2004. (In Russ.).
5. Williamson O. I. Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma. Firmy, rynki, «otnoshencheskaya» kontraktatsiya [Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, 'Relations' Contraction]. Saint Petersburg, Lenizdat, 1996. (In Russ.).
6. Ustyuzhanina E. V., Evsyukov S. G., Petrov A. G. Organizatsionnoe stroenie krupnykh korporatsiy kak faktor stimulirovaniya (sderzhivaniya) ikh innovatsionnogo razvitiya [Organizational Structures of Large Corporations as a Factor of Stimulating (Restraining) their Innovation Development], Natsional'nye interesy. Prioritety i bezopasnost' [National Interests. Priorities and Security], 2013, No. 32 (221), pp. 10–32. (In Russ.).
7. Sheyn E. Organizatsionnaya kul'tura i liderstvo [Corporate Culture and Leadership]. Saint Petersburg, Piter, 2012. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Ustyuzhanina E.V. FORMS OF BUSINESS INTEGRATION: VIEW FROM THE POSITIONS OF INSTITUTIONAL THEORY. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2015;(2):34-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2015-2-34-45
Views:
323
Email this article 