Estimating Dynamic Effects of Innovation Policy in Regions of Russia: Using GMM Systems for Panel Data with Time Lags
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2026-4-116-129
Abstract
In conditions of economic uncertainty and the need to attain technological sovereignty estimation of innovation policy efficiency in Russian regions becomes more and more important. However, traditional econometric methods often do not take into account endogen nature of factors and dynamic character of innovation processes, which can cause mixed estimations. The present research proposes to use dynamic panel model using systemic generalized method of moments (System GMM) to analyze determinants of innovation development. On the basis of data of 82 regions of Russia for 2014–2023 the model including lagged values of dependent variable and key factors of innovation policy was estimated. Validity of the model was confirmed by complex of diagnostic tests: the absence of autocorrelation of the second order (p-value = 0.1586) and validity of tools (Hanson test, p-value = 0.6186). Results showed complicated time dynamics. Positive effect of R&D expenses is clear with two-year lag, special economic zones demonstrate positive impact in the short-term period with subsequent inverse effect while human capital of high qualification showed stable negative impact on innovation output. Methodological contribution of the research lies in demonstration of System GMM application for correct estimation of dynamic effects in panel data by Russian regions and elaboration of practical recommendations on taking into account of time lags in developing scientific and technological policy.
About the Author
S. E. Demidova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana E. Demidova, PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Public Finance of the Financial University
49/2 Leningradskiy Avenue, Moscow, 125167
References
1. Alandarov R. A. Institutsionalnye problemy i perspektivy finansirovaniya NIOKR v Rossii [Institutional Problems and Prospects of Financing R&D in Russia]. Finansy , 2022, No. 1, pp. 7–12. (In Russ.).
2. Glazev S. Yu. Ryvok v budushchee: Rossiya v novykh tekhnologicheskom i mirokhozyay-stvennom ukladakh [Leap into the Future: Russia in New Technological and World Economic Orders]. Moscow, Knizhnyy mir, 2018. (In Russ.).
3. Golova I. M. Ekosistemnyy podkhod k upravleniyu innovatsionnymi protsessami v rossiyskikh regionakh [Ecosystem Approach to Managing Innovation Processes in Russian Regions]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 2021, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 1346–1360. (In Russ.).
4. Grishina I. V., Polynev A. O., Ugryumova A. A. Vliyanie diversifikatsii ekonomiki na proizvoditelnost truda v rossiyskikh regionakh [The Impact of Economic Diversification on Labor Productivity in Russian Regions]. Regionologiya [Regionology], 2024, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 691–711. (In Russ.).
5. Petrov Yu. V. Resursodobyvayushchie regiony RF: delimitatsiya, transformatsii, riski [Resource Regions of the Russian Federation: Delimitation, Transformations, Risks]. Geopolitika i ekogeodinamika regionov [Geopolitics and Ecogeodynamics of Regions], 2023, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 100–109. (In Russ.).
6. Sukharev O. S. Nauka, innovatsii i investitsii: perspektivy rossiyskoy industrializatsii [Science, Innovation and Investment: Prospects of Russian Industrialization]. Ekonomika nauki [Economics of Science], 2025, No. 1. (In Russ.). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/ article/n/nauka-innovatsii-i-investitsii-perspektivy-rossiyskoy-industrializatsii (accessed 03.11.2024).
7. Tviss B. Upravlenie nauchno-tekhnicheskimi novovvedeniyami [Management of Scientific and Technical Innovations]. Moscow, Ekonomika, 1989. (In Russ.).
8. Uzhegov A. O. Industrialnyy profil regionov i vozmozhnosti ikh vysokotekhnologichnogo razvitiya [Industrial Profile of the Regions and Possibilities of Their High-Tech Development]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika» [Bulletin of Omsk University. Series "Economics"], 2023, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 118–128. (In Russ.).
9. Shirov A. A., Belousov D. R., Blokhin A. A., Gusev M. S., Klepach A. N., Uzyakov M. N. Rossiya 2035: novoe kachestvo natsionalnoy ekonomiki [Russia 2035: A New Quality of the National Economy]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Problems of Forecasting], 2024, No. 2, pp. 6–20. (In Russ.).
10. Shumpeter Y. A. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: (Issledovanie predprinimatelskoy pribyli, kapitala, kredita, protsenta i tsikla konyunktury) [Theory of Economic Development: (Research of Entrepreneurial Profit, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle)], translated from German V. S. Avtonomov et al. Moscow, Progress, 1982. (In Russ.).
11. Acemoglu D., Akcigit U., Celik M. A. Young, Restless and Creative: Openness to Disruption and Creative Innovations. MIT Department of Economics Working Paper , 2015, No. 14-07. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2392109 (accessed 03.11.2024).
12. Aghion Ph., Howitt P. A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction. NBER Working Paper , 1990, No. 3223. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3386/w3223 (accessed 14.10.2025).
13. Arellano M., Bond S. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies , 1991, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 277–297.
14. Asheim B. T., Gertler M. S. The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation , ed. by J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, R. R. Nelson. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 291–317.
15. Blundell R., Bond S. Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 1998, Vol. 87, No. 1, pp. 115–143.
16. Chesbrough H. W. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, Harvard Business Review Press, 2003.
17. Drucker P. Post-Capitalist Society. 1st ed. London, Routledge, 1993.
18. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy , 2000, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 109–123.
19. Fritsch M., Slavtchev V. Universities and Innovation in Space. Industry and Innovation , 2007, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 201–218.
20. Gokhberg L., Roud V., Schwaag S. S. The Role of Universities in Russia's Innovation System. The De Gruyter Handbook of Innovation and Science Policy , ed. by S. Kuhlmann, G. Ordóñez-Matamoros. Berlin, De Gruyter, 2016, pp. 415–438.
21. Griliches Z. Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth. Bell Journal of Economics , 1979, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 92–116.
22. Kutsenko E., Islankina E., Abashkin V. The Impact of Special Economic Zones on Regional Development: The Case of Russia. Regional Studies , 2021, Vol. 55, No. 10-11, pp. 1757–1769.
23. Liberati D., Marinucci M., Tanzi G. M. Science and Technology Parks in Italy: A Case Study. Journal of Technology Transfer , 2016, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 818–837.
24. Lundvall B.-Å. (ed.). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London, Pinter Publishers, 1992.
25. Markham S. K., Ward S. J., Aiman-Smith L., Kingon A. I. The Valley of Death as Context for Role Theory in Product Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management , 2010, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 402–417.
26. Mokyr J. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2002.
27. Nelson R. R. (ed.). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York, Oxford University Press, 1993.
28. Radosevic S. The Electronics Industry in Central and Eastern Europe: A New Global Production Location. The Emergence of the Digital Economy in Central and Eastern Europe , ed. by B. K. Kusters, B. Lengeler, H. M. Wagner. Berlin, Springer, 2002, pp. 145–169.
29. Rastvortseva S., Shash N., Zhukov A. Regional Innovation Resilience in Russia: The Impact of the 2022 shock. Journal of Economic Studies , 2023, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 145–162.
30. Simachev Y., Fedyunina A., Kuzyk M. The Impact of Regional Innovation Systems on Firm Innovation in Russia. Post-Communist Economies , 2021, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 1–25.
31. Sinenko O., Mayburov I. Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Special Economic Zones and Their Influence on the Development of Territories. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues , 2017, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 115–122.
32. Wang Z., Long X., Peng X., Li C. Research on the Impact of Human Capital and R&D Investment on Manufacturing Technology Innovation. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences , 2022, Vol. 2, No. 11, pp. 375–381.
Review
For citations:
Demidova S.E. Estimating Dynamic Effects of Innovation Policy in Regions of Russia: Using GMM Systems for Panel Data with Time Lags. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2026;23(4):116-129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2026-4-116-129
Views:
24
JATS XML
Email this article 