THE USE OF LIE LOGIC IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING CHILDREN
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2017-5-30-36
Abstract
Neo-classical logic was developed in mathematics in the late 19th – early 20th century. One example of neo-classic logic is lie logic. The article on the basis of analyzing the stages of psychical development of children carried out by J. Piaget, a prominent Swiss psychologist and philosopher builds lie logic and discusses different aspects of its use in pedagogic theory and practice. On the basis of their personal pedagogical experience the authors substantiate the idea that people at the same stage of development demonstrate similar forms of cognitive abilities. They also conduct comparative analysis of classical truth logic and lie logic from the point of view of mathematic logic.
About the Authors
Marianna N. Maksimenko
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD, Doctor Information Science of the Rouen University (France), Assistant Professor of the Department for Higher Mathematics.
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997.
Rouzan E. Mirzakhanyan
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department for Higher Mathematics.
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997.
Vladimir A. Mushrub
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD, Assistant Professor of the Department for Mathematical Methods in Economics.
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997.
References
1. Biryukov B. V. Sistemnaya slozhnost' intellekta i teoretiko-gruppovoy podkhod (opyt obobshcheniya modeli logiki intellekta Zh. Piazhe) [The System Complexity of Intellect and Theoretical and Group Approach (the Experience of Summing-up the Model of Intellect Logic by J. Piaget)]. Obshchaya teoriya sistem i integratciya znaniy, materialy seminara [The General Theory of Systems and Knowledge Integration, seminar materials]. Moscow, 1976. (In Russ.).
2. Biryukov B. V., Biryukova L. G. Gruppa operatciy nad natural'nymi propozitcional'nymi istinnostnymi i lozhnostnymi ischisleniyami i vopros o «edinstve» myshleniya [Group of Operation over Natural Propositional Truthful and False Calculations and the Issue of ‘Common’ Thinking]. Logika i metodologiya nauki. Logika. K XV Vsemirnomu kongressu filosofov [Logic and Methodology of Science. Logic. To the 15th World Congress of Philosophers]. Moscow, 1973. (In Russ.).
3. Vakhrusheva A. Yu., Goremykina G. I., Shchukina N. A. Metodologiya otcenki vozdeystviya makrosredy na funktcionirovanie vuza v usloviyakh neopredelennosti [Methodology of Assessing the Impact of Macro-Environment on University Functioning in Conditions of Uncertainty]. RISK: Resursy, Informatciya, Snabzhenie, Konkurentciya [RISC: Resources, Information, Supply, Competition], 2017, No. 1, pp. 140–145. (In Russ.).
4. Erokhina T. A., Lokutcievskiy V. O., Maksimenko M. N., Shemetkova O. L. Diskretnaya matematika [Discrete Mathematics]. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova, elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal [Izvestiya of the Plehanov Russian University of Economics, E-academic journal], 2012, No. 2 (7). (In Russ.).
5. Krylov A. K. Otlichiya chelovecheskoy logiki ot matematicheskoy logiki [The Difference between Human Logics and Mathematic Logics]. V Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentciya «Integrirovannye modeli i myagkie vychisleniya v iskusstvennom intellekte», sbornik nauchnykh trudov [5th International Conference ‘Integrated Models and Soft Calculations in Artificial Intellect‘, collection of works], in 2 vol. Moscow, Fizmatlit, 2009, Vol. 2, pp. 941–949. (In Russ.).
6. Mirzakhanyan R. E. Primenenie sovremennykh nauchno-pedagogicheskikh tekhnologiy pri podgotovke studentov po distcipline «Diskretnaya matematika» [The Use of Advanced Scientific and Pedagogic Technologies for Training Students on the Subject ‘Discrete Mathematics’]. Aktual'nye voprosy obespecheniya obrazovatel'noy i nauchnoy deyatel'nosti v universitete [Acute Problems of Providing Educational and Research Activity in University]. Moscow, FGBOU VO «REU im. G. V. Plekhanova», 2016, pp. 35–38. (In Russ.).
7. Mochalina E. P., Ivankova G. V., Maslyakova I. N., Tatarnikov O. V. Sovmestnoe otcenivanie urovnya podgotovki i slozhnosti zadaniya [Joint Assessment of the Level of Training and Task Complexity]. Obrazovanie, nauka i ekonomika v vuzakh i shkolakh. Integratciya v mezhdunarodnoe obrazovatel'noe prostranstvo, trudy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentcii. Goris (Armeniya), 28 sentyabrya – 2 oktyabrya 2015 g. [Education, Science and Economics in Universities and Schools. Integrationin International Education Space, works of the International Conference. Goris (Armenia), 28 September – 2 October 2015]. Moscow, 2015, pp. 147–157. (In Russ.).
8. Piaget J. V. Moral'noe suzhdenie u rebenka [Moral Judgment of Child]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt, 2006. (Series ‘Psychological Technologies’). (In Russ.).
9. Filippova N. V., Bykanova O. A. Predstavitel'skie lektcii o finansovoy gramotnosti kak chast' proforientatcionnoy raboty [Representation Lecturers about Finance Literacy as a Part of Orientation Work]. Sborniki konferentciy NITc «Sotciosfera» [Collection of Conferences of the ‘Sociosphere’ Center], 2016, No. 38, pp. 146–151. (In Russ.).
10. Church A. Vvedenie v matematicheskuyu logiku [Introduction in Mathematic Logic]. Vol. 1. Moscow, Publishing House of Foreign Literature, 1960. (In Russ.).
11. Edel'man S. L. Mathematic Logic. Moscow, Higher School, 1975. (In Russ.).
12. Evans J. St. B. T. Bias in Human Reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 1989.
13. Simon H. A. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York, Wiley, 1957.
Review
For citations:
Maksimenko M.N., Mirzakhanyan R.E., Mushrub V.A. THE USE OF LIE LOGIC IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING CHILDREN. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2017;(5):30-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2017-5-30-36
Views:
300
Email this article 