Preview

Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Advanced search

Entrepreneurial Coenosis in View of Evolutionary Approach

https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2019-1-120-134

Abstract

The goal of the article is to study current entrepreneurship as economic coenosis being an economic environment, which comes into being during evolution of economic relations. To reach the set goal it is necessary to reveal foundations of inter-disciplinary research of economic processes, to identify evolutionary features of current entrepreneurship functioning and to design basic notions of coenological idea of entrepreneurship leaning on the theory of techno-coenosis. Methodological solution of this problem is possible through identifying general features of complex systems’ shaping – both biological, technical and economic, which are capable of self-organization. The use of coenological approach is grounded in respect of regional entrepreneurship as a type of current economic reality. On the basis of achievements of the theory of systematic, evolution and techno-coenosis the authors provide theoretical and methodological substantiation of using the idea of entrepreneurial coenosis as a new form of the development of complex economic systems. The article shows that the solution of this problem is possible because of the availability of general features, mechanisms of the development, factors and causes of emerging structural and dynamic processes in economic systems with biological, technical and other complex systems characterized by self-organization. By using the example of financial resources, i.e. energy necessary to form the start conditions the logics of evolutionary and population processes of developing regional entrepreneurship was discussed and the algorithm of affecting the relevant economic population was put forward. The obtained findings show that it is necessary to use the coenosis theory in order to describe and analyze the current entrepreneurship as a new objective economic reality, for which evolutionary laws of development are the most important.

About the Authors

A. N. Kuzminov
Rostov State University of Economics
Russian Federation

Aleksander N. Kuzminov - Doctor of Economics, Professor of the Department for Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship of the RSUE.

69 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, 344002.



V. M. Dzukha
Rostov State University of Economics
Russian Federation

Vladimir M. Dzukha - Doctor of Economics, Professor, the Head of the Department for Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship of the RSUE.

69 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, 344002.



I. G. Paliy
Rostov State University of Economics
Russian Federation

Irina G. Paliy - Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, the Head of the Department for Philosophy and Culture Science of the RSUE.

69 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, 344002.



References

1. Artur U. B. Teoriya slozhnosti v ekonomicheskoy nauke: inye osnovy ekonomicheskogo myshleniya [Theory of Complexity in Economic Science: Other Bases of Economic understanding]. Terra Economicus, 2015, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 15–37. (In Russ.).

2. Arshakuni K. V. Ekonometricheskoe modelirovanie genezisa i dinamiki malykh novykh predpriyatiy. Avtoref. dis. kand. ekon. nauk [Econometric Modeling of the Genesis and Dynamics of Small New Enterprises. PhD econ. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2005. (In Russ.).

3. Gnatyuk V. I. Modeli i metody prognozirovaniya elektropotrebleniya pri upravlenii ob"ektami regional'nogo elektrotekhnicheskogo kompleksa [Models and Methods for Predicting Power Consumption in the Management of Objects of the Regional Electrical Engineering Complex]. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie [Mathematical Modeling], 2017, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 109–121. (In Russ.).

4. Knyazeva E. N., Alyushin A. L. BIG HISTORY: evolyutsionnoe myshlenie v global'noy perspective [BIG HISTORY: Evolutionary Thinking in the Global Perspective]. Vek globalizatsii [The Age of Globalization], 2016, No. 3, pp. 16–31. (In Russ.).

5. Kudrin B. I. Klassika tekhnicheskikh tsenozov. Obshchaya i prikladnaya tsenologiya. Vyp. 31. Tsenologicheskie issledovaniya [Classics of Technical Coenosis. General and Applied Cenology. Issue 31. Cenological Research]. Tomsk, TGU – Center for System Studies, 2006.

6. Kuz'minov A. N. Upravlenie ustoychivost'yu regiona: tsenologicheskaya model' [Sustainability Management of the Region: a Coenoses Model]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of the Region], 2009, No. 2, pp. 142–152. (In Russ.).

7. Kuz'minov A. N., Shirokov I. O., Abdullaev R. R. Instrumentariy issledovaniya industrial'noy dinamiki v kontekste vyzhivaemosti predprinimatel'skikh struktur [Instrumentation of the Study of Industrial Dynamics in the Context of the Survival of Entrepreneurial Structures]. Uchet i statistika [Accounting and Statistics], 2016, No. 1, pp. 87–96. (In Russ.).

8. Kuizheva S. K., Kuz'minov A. N. Tsenologicheskaya otsenka obrazovatel'nogo landshafta RF [The Evaluation of the Educational Landscape of the Russian Federation]. Nauchnyy zhurnal KubGAU [Scientific Journal of KubSAU], 2016, No. 7 (121), pp. 1081–1097. (In Russ.).

9. Martynenko G. Ya. Chislovaya garmoniya tsenozov [Numerical Harmony of Coenoses]. Akademiya Trinitarizma [The Academy of Trinitarianism], 2009, El. No. 77-6567, publ. 15453, 06.08.2009. (In Russ.).

10. Smirnov V. P. Primenenie refleksivnogo podkhoda v issledovanii sovremennogo predprinimatel'stva [The Application of the Reflexive Approach in the Study of Modern Entrepreneurship]. Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki [Problems of the Modern Economy], 2011, No. 1 (37), pp. 123–127. (In Russ.).

11. Fufaev V. V. Ekonomicheskie tsenozy organizatsiy [Economic Coenosis of Organizations], Center for System Studies. Moscow, Abakan, 2006. (In Russ.).

12. Chepurenko A. Yu. Vozmozhna li teoriya predprinimatel'stva v Rossii? [Is the Theory of Entrepreneurship Possible in Russia?]. Issleduya predprinimatel'stvo [Investigating Entrepreneurship]. Moscow, NIU HSE Publishing House, 2014, pp. 369–397. (In Russ.).

13. Antonelli C. Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA, Edward Elgar, 2011. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/refhub/S0954-349X(15)00062-4/sbref0010

14. Arthur W. B. The Nature of Technology: What it is and How it Evolves. New York, 2009. Available at: http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0954-349X(15)00062-4/sbref0020

15. Axelrod R. M. The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1997. Available at: http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0954-349X(15)00062-4/sbref0005

16. Baumol W. J., Sue A. B., Wolf B. N., Wolf E. N. Productivity and American Leadership. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1989.

17. Cziko G. Without Miracles: Universal Selection Theory and the Second Darwinian Revolution. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1995.

18. David P. A. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 1985, No. 75, pp. 332–337. Available at: http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0954-349X(15)00062-4/sbref0080

19. Dosi G., Fagiolo G., Roventini A. Schumpeter Meeting Keynes: a Policy-Friendly Model of Endogenous Growth and Business Cycles. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2010, No. 34, pp. 1748–1767.

20. Dunn T., Holtz-Eakin D. Financial Capital, Human Capital, and the Transition to Self-Employment: Evidence from Intergenerational Links. Journal of Labor Economics, 2000, Vol. 18 (2), pp. 282–305.

21. Evans D. S. The Relation between Firm Growth, Size, and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1987b, June, pp. 567–581.

22. Foster J. Competition, Competitive Selection and Economic Evolution. Garrouste P., Ioannides S. (eds.). Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, 2001, pp. 107–132.

23. Hodgson G. M. Darwinism in Economics: from Analogy to Ontology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2012, No. 12 (3), pp. 259–281. Available at: http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00191/papers/2012003/20120259.pdf

24. Kuz'minov A. N., Dzhuha V. M., Ternovsky O. A. Methodology of Structural Stability Management for Industrial Enterprises. European Research Studies Journal, 2017, Vol. 20, No. 3B, pp. 260–268.

25. Kuznets S. S. Economic Growth of Nations, Total Output and Productivity Structure. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1971.

26. Lawrence P. R. Organization and Environment Perspective. Van de Ven A. H., Joyce W. F. Perspectives on Organizat Design and Behavior. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1981, pp. 311–345.

27. Llerena P., Lorentz A. Cumulative Causation and Evolutionary Micro-Founded Technical Change. Revue Economique, 2004, No. 55, pp. 1191–1214. Available at: http:// refhub.elsevier.com/S0954-349X(15)00062-4/sbref0205

28. Romer P. M. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, No. 98, pp. 71–102.

29. Shackle G. Epistemics and Economics. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1972.

30. Simon H. A. The Science of the Artificial. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1969. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/refhub/S0954-349X(15)00062-4/sbref0340

31. Weber B. H., Depew D. J. Natural Selection and Self-Organisation: Dynamical Models as Clues to a New Evolutionary Synthesis. Biology and Philosophy, 1996, No. 11, pp. 33–65.

32. Witt U. Self-Organization and Economics – what is new? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 1997, No. 8, pp. 489–507.

33. Zagler M. Economic Growth, Structural Change, and Search Unemployment. Journal of Economics, 2009, No. 96, pp. 63–78.


Review

For citations:


Kuzminov A.N., Dzukha V.M., Paliy I.G. Entrepreneurial Coenosis in View of Evolutionary Approach. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2019;(1):120-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2019-1-120-134

Views: 520


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2413-2829 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9251 (Online)