Prospects of Developing Corporate Culture of Civil Service
https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2023-1-155-161
Abstract
As a rule to shape culture executives would use traditional principles of management typical of companies of the 20th century, they build relations with a high distance of authority and leave no space for creativity, flexibility and independence of personnel. This type of culture is alien to employees, it does not meet today’s requirements and at the same time it hinders the development of the executive himself/herself. Present day challenges need both new technologies and innovation and transformation of corporate culture into flexible adaptive system, which proves management with an opportunity to interact with the team in a more effective way. The article researches characteristics of bureaucratic culture typical of today’s state and municipal enterprises. In the structure of corporate culture the author shows the role of artifacts, declared values basic ideas, business ethics and standardization level. Missions and values of state-owned companies were assessed and advantages and drawbacks of their corporate culture were shown. As a result of the research the author put forward a model of corporate culture elements appropriate for the present day state-owned company. This article will be useful for executives of state and municipal organizations, as well as specialists dealing with the development of corporate culture in the state sector.
About the Author
T. I. Zakharova
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana I. Zakharova PhD, Assistant Professor of Basic Department of Charity fund for support of educational programs "Capitains" "Innovative Management and Social Entrepreneurship"
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 117997
References
1. Valiev R. G., Gorbachev I. G. Byurokratiya i byurokratizm (politiko-pravovye aspekty) [Bureaucracy and Bureaucratism (Political and Legal Aspects)]. Kazan, Publishing House of the Kazan State University, 2008. (In Russ.).
2. Vlast i korporativnyy biznes v dolgovremennoy strategii razvitiya izmenyayushcheysya Rossii [Power and Corporate Business in the Long-Term Strategy of Changing Russia Development]. Moscow, 2008. (In Russ.).
3. Grishin V. I., Domashchenko D. V., Konstantinova L. V., Koshkin A. P., Ustyuzhanina E. V., Shtykhno D. A., Shubenkova E. V. Zhizn posle pandemii: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye posledstviya [Life after Pandemic: Economic and Social After-Effects]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2020, No. 3 (111), pp. 5–18. (In Russ.).
4. Zakharova T. I. «Kulturnaya» korporativnaya kultura [‘Cultural’ Corporate Culture]. Ekonomicheskie nauki [Economic Sciences], 2013, No. 10, pp. 150. (In Russ.).
5. Zvereva N. I., Surova N. Yu. Regulirovanie sotsialnogo predprinimatelstva v Rossii [Regulating Social Entrepreneurship in Russia]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2020, No. 5 (101), pp. 101–109. (In Russ.).
6. Krivoruchko T. O. Upravlenie korporativnoy kulturoy gosuchrezhdeniya [Governing Corporate Culture in State Organization]. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty nauchnykh issledovaniy, materialy Mezhdunarodnoy (zaochnoy) nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Sofiya, 19 aprelya 2019 goda [Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Research: materials of the International Conference, Sofia, April 19, 2019]. Sofiya, Academic-Publishing Center ‘Mir Nauki’ (Vostretsov A. I.), 2019, pp. 250–261. (In Russ.).
7. Kudryavykh O. D., Vlasova T. A. Izuchenie elementov korporativnoy kultury i obobshchennye rezultaty analiza korporativnoy kultury [Studying Elements of Corporate Culture and Summarized Results of Corporate Culture Analysis]. Forum molodykh uchenykh [Forum of Young Scientists], 2018, No. 12-2 (28), pp. 1247–1250. (In Russ.).
8. Lebedeva N. M., Tatarko A. N. Tsennosti kultury i razvitie obshchestva [Cultural Values and Society Development]. Moscow, Publishing House of GU VShE, 2007. (In Russ.).
9. Podolskiy D. A. K voprosu o tsennostnom izmerenii upravlencheskoy deyatelnosti [Concerning Value Assessment of Managerial Work]. Mir psikhologii [The World of Psychology], 2021, No. 4 (107), pp. 65–76. (In Russ.).
10. Ustyuzhanina E. V., Gubarev R. V., Iskandaryan R. A., Losyakov A. V., Svechnikov V. A., Yarushev S. A., Evsyukov S. G. Sotsialnaya politika i ee vliyanie na proizvoditelnost truda [Social Policy and Its Impact on Labour Productivity]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G. V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2020, No. 2 (110), pp. 51–65. (In Russ.).
11. Chevtaeva N. G. Korporativnost sotsialno-professionalnoy gruppy rossiyskogo chinovnichestva: sotsiologicheskiy analiz [Corporate Nature of Social-Professional Group of Russian Officials: Sociological Analysis]. Ekaterinburg, the Ural Academy of Civil Service, 2006. (In Russ.).
12. Sheyn E. Organizatsionnaya kultura i liderstvo [Organizational Culture and Leadership]. Saint Petersburg, Piter, 2012. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Zakharova T.I. Prospects of Developing Corporate Culture of Civil Service. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2023;20(1):155-161. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2023-1-155-161
Views:
466
Email this article 